Thanks Ryan, Let me look into this right away.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Ryan Blue
wrote:
> -1 (binding)
>
> There are a few things that could be improved, but my -1 is because the
> release tarball doesn’t match the release tag (inclusion of
> .example-image), some files are missing the
-0
I started a review and noticed that the RELEASE_NOTES.md is for 0.1.0 and the
copyright year in NOTICE should be updated.
I’ll stop for now.
Regards,
Dave
> On Nov 3, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Ryan Blue wrote:
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> There are a few things that could be improved, but my -1 is beca
-1 (binding)
There are a few things that could be improved, but my -1 is because the
release tarball doesn’t match the release tag (inclusion of
.example-image), some files are missing the license header, and there is no
mention in the license file of mesos-protobuf that’s included in the
tarball.
+1
-- Checked Headers
-- Checked License
-- Checked DISCLAIMER and Incubator policies
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1).
>
> The PPM vote thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.ap
Here is my +1, any other volunteers to verify/vote for the release.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Luciano Resende
wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1).
>
> The PPM vote thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg015
Please vote to approve the release of Apache Toree 0.2.0-incubating (RC1).
The PPM vote thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01527.html
And the result:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@toree.incubator.apache.org/msg01539.html
Tag: v0.2.0-incubating-rc1 (01cd97e9
