The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was
tabled due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code
or the community.
The reason was an editorial error on my side, I used the wrong template
and the last paragraph releasing the incubator from its responsib
Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?
On Oct 21, 2015 21:09, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote:
> The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was tabled
> due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code or the
> community.
>
> The reason was an editorial
Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer to
"podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
paragraph from the template, releasing the Incubator from responsibility.
See th
On Oct 21, 2015 22:48, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>
> Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
> match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer
to
> "podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
> paragraph from the template
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator
> approval. If you wait 4 weeks you don't graduate until December.
The Incubator isn't going to vote again. The text of the graduation
resolution from an Incubator
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?..
4 weeks is to get the board to vote on the resolution - our meeting
was yesterday and the next one is on November 18.
As Hadrian says, It is unfortunate that nobody caught that, we no
Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the
board meeting. Now I get it.
On Oct 21, 2015 23:09, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator
> > app
Indeed, if Hadrian had succeeded in editing during the meeting, it would
have been fixed right then. Murphy weighed in and we have a 4 week delay.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:03 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the
> board meeting.