Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:25, Jakarta General Newsgroup wrote: > Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview) > From: Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > === > Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > > > >> > > 'News' as a measure of activity on a project

Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread @Basebeans.com
Subject: Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview) From: Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> === Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > >> > > 'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless. >> > > Commits/month would be a lot better. > True. >

Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 17:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM: > > > > 'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless. > > > Commits/month would be a lot better. > > > > > > > Hummm...I'll put that comment in

Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread dion
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/03/2002 12:39:09 AM: > > 'News' as a measure of activity on a project is effectively useless. > > Commits/month would be a lot better. > > > > Hummm...I'll put that comment in the pile of "the most important > activity in software development

Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 14:47 22.03.2002 -0800, you wrote: >- Audience and "Marketing": >The document is directed towards people who may not be familiar >with all the projects that exist under the Jakarta umbrella. >Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find >something useful for their own projects.

Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 03:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Philipp K. Janert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM: > > > > [snip] > > I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to > > provide is simply documentation, not different in principle > > than Javadoc, only

Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 17:47, Philipp K. Janert wrote: > > Dear Friends! > > First off, many thanks to Ted for posting my Draft Jakarta > Overview, thus allowing everyone to review it, and many thanks > to all who provided feedback on it, for or against. > > I would like to comment on some of

RE: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread Leo Simons
> - Audience and "Marketing": > Specifically, it is directed towards users, who hope to find > something useful for their own projects. (Those users may turn > into contributors over time!) It takes too much effort to support a user base for a project that changes rapidly (ie any 'alpha' status c

Re: Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-23 Thread dion
Philipp K. Janert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 23/03/2002 09:47:31 AM: > [snip] > I don't think documentation is marketing - and what I tried to > provide is simply documentation, not different in principle > than Javadoc, only at a higher level. Except it also contained words such as immature

Now what? (was: Jakarta Overview)

2002-03-22 Thread Philipp K . Janert
Dear Friends! First off, many thanks to Ted for posting my Draft Jakarta Overview, thus allowing everyone to review it, and many thanks to all who provided feedback on it, for or against. I would like to comment on some of the issues raised. - Purpose and Redundancy: To clarify the intended