On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:41:27PM +, Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> Respectful Gentoo developers,
>
> I would like to ask what do you think about UTF-8 encoded manual pages?
> I mean, the files like ls.1.gz, which are used by honorable "man" program.
> Recently I attacked the problem a little a
XMLTV_OPTS isn't accessible anymore through the ebuild (tomorrow it
was).
So I'll need a TV_GRAB expanded variable to avoid having 200 local flags.
Anyone has something against the addition of such variable into
|"profiles/base/make.default" ?
mattepiu
|
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73435
Carsten
pgpKF6FDhzFGj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 02 June 2006 00:12, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems, i have some *.la files on my system, that don't belong to any
> ebuild anymore. I noticed that, because the new revdep-rebuild
> (gentoolkit 0.2.2) also check *.la files, and some were broken (pointing
> to a libstdc++.la of gcc 4
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
As I requested in an earlier email, I would like it to be discussed how
we want to handle alter
Hi,
it seems, i have some *.la files on my system, that don't belong to any
ebuild anymore. I noticed that, because the new revdep-rebuild
(gentoolkit 0.2.2) also check *.la files, and some were broken (pointing
to a libstdc++.la of gcc 4.1.1 - but gcc 4.1.1 has none).
So the history is:
- gcc 3.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:44:39 +0200
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on
> the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager requirements.
Isn't it customary for issues raised on the list to be addressed before
a GLE
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:10:04 -0700
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT]
> > > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49
> > Incidentally, I drafted a competing GLEP
> R
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT]
> > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on
> > the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager requirements.
>
> Incidentally, I drafted
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:00:13 -0500
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT]
> > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on
> > the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager
> > requirements.
>
> Inciden
Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT]
> I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 as has been discussed on
> the list some weeks ago. It is about the package manager requirements.
Incidentally, I drafted a competing GLEP that I posted to -dev
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) that was eith
On Thursday 01 June 2006 13:02, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
> 2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 01 June 2006 20:19, Jan Kundrát wrote:
>> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
>>> Summing up:
>>> * UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
>> The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in piece.
>
> Would it be p
On Thursday 01 June 2006 20:19, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> > Summing up:
> > * UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
>
> The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in piece.
Would it be possible to do automatic detection and unicode conversion in the
portage in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
>
>>Summing up:
>>* UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
>
>
> The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in piece.
Agreed. I'd like to see much more extensive use of Unicode throughout
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote:
> Summing up:
> * UTF-8 manuals: good or bad?
The Only Way To Go (tm), IMHO. Let's let the legacy encodings die in piece.
> Any constructive comments are more than welcome!
The very same problem exists with man-pages-cs (which are outdated as a
bonus).
Blésmrt,
-jkt
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
Respectful Gentoo developers,
I would like to ask what do you think about UTF-8 encoded manual pages?
I mean, the files like ls.1.gz, which are used by honorable "man" program.
Recently I attacked the problem a little and before submitting any
patches/proposals to Gentoo bugzilla I'd like to know
Hi all,
I'm leaving Gentoo. This isn't due to ill feelings or anything like that; I
just have no time to work on Gentoo anymore, and have been 'dormant' for many
months now. This isn't going to change anytime soon, and so there's no point
in my keeping the account.
I've enjoyed working on Gent
19 matches
Mail list logo
