[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/libva: ChangeLog libva-1.0.10.ebuild

2011-03-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:23:03 +0100 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > 1) it has freedesktop web page, and we should preffer fdo alternatives > anyway > 2) it has existing git repo (could not find repo for the va you use) > 3) debian/archlinux/fedora use this one I commited, not former one. > 4) the bug was re

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/libva: ChangeLog libva-1.0.10.ebuild

2011-03-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 8.3.2011 15:51, Alexis Ballier napsal(a): > On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 09:28:13 AM Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: >> scarabeus11/03/08 12:28:13 >> >> Modified: ChangeLog >> Added:libva-1.0.10.ebuild >> Log: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200 > Antoni Grzyma??a wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, Micha? Grny wrote: > > > On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 > > > Olivier Cr??te wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 2011-03-07

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200 Antoni Grzymała wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 > > Olivier Crête wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > >> > Why does everyone assume it needs to be enf

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-libs/libva: ChangeLog libva-1.0.10.ebuild

2011-03-08 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 09:28:13 AM Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote: > scarabeus11/03/08 12:28:13 > > Modified: ChangeLog > Added:libva-1.0.10.ebuild > Log: > Update to libva shipped by freedesktop. So we do the same as debian or > archlinux. Fixes bug #3

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Antoni Grzymała
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 Olivier Crête wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Why does everyone assume it needs to be enforced? If user is > interested in protecting his/her data, he/she can simply use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 Olivier Crête wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Why does everyone assume it needs to be enforced? If user is > > interested in protecting his/her data, he/she can simply use > > https://. If he/she is not, there is no real reaso

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 07:50 Tue 08 Mar , Hans de Graaff wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:13 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API > > access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the > > python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugz

[gentoo-dev] Eclass review: gnome.org

2011-03-08 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi list, here is an updated revision of gnome.org.eclass. Changes are: * eclass documentation * use versionator instead of bash expression (also it worked for years, the change is done for consistency with versionator use case policy) * new eclass variable, GNOME

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 07-03-2011 17:25:02 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > As outsider, I don't like to accept another certificate thing, just to > > view a bugtracker. > > if we're only forcing *login*, then this isnt an issue +1 -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level