[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] About DELL ALPS touchpad

2014-07-03 Thread taozhijiang
definitely was set to y CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2_ALPS=y The touchpad was, but just basicly. So I want to full featured such as multi-touch and scroll 2014-07-04 Thanks & Best Regards. 陶治江 | TAO Zhijiang 研发处 | SOHO国际产品线 发件人: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn 发送时间: 2014-07-03 17:19:31 收件人: gentoo-

Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > Did the Funtoo devs tell you that they don't run repoman because of the > explosive set of possible combinations that flavors & mix-ins introduce? > > Having it run over them should be easy; but having it run within a > reasonable time when scal

Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Tom Wijsman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 14:41:03 -0400 "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote: > I've talked to the funtoo devs a few times about stealing their > profile idea. A few things need to be done to make this happen, > mainly eselect, catalyst, and repoman suppor

Re: [gentoo-dev] should /etc/init.d/sysctl be run in lxc guests?

2014-07-03 Thread Sergey Popov
03.07.2014 20:02, William Hubbs пишет: > This is a question to lxc users, since I don't run it. > > I have a bug against OpenRC in which the user is saying that I should > allow /etc/init.d/sysctl to run inside an lxc container [1]. > > My understanding is that this is not a good idea since an lx

Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/07/14 04:47 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 07/03/2014 03:00, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >> >> On 07/03/2014 08:18 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: >>> On 07/02/2014 13:54, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16 >>> [snip] >>

[gentoo-dev] should /etc/init.d/sysctl be run in lxc guests?

2014-07-03 Thread William Hubbs
This is a question to lxc users, since I don't run it. I have a bug against OpenRC in which the user is saying that I should allow /etc/init.d/sysctl to run inside an lxc container [1]. My understanding is that this is not a good idea since an lxc container actually changes settings in the host's

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Mittwoch 02 Juli 2014, 15:07:12 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: > > I don't know how to get from here to there. The problem isn't just > constructing an alternative profile tree. We could even have > /usr/portage/profiles-r2 and switch between the two on demand. The > problem is there's a lot of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Peter Stuge
Michał Górny wrote: > > abi/x86 can't be both a file and a subdir. > > Profiles are directories... Doh, yes of course. :\ abi rather than abis is still important. :) //Peter pgp7Suon0xtIh.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > This can't work; abi/x86 can't be both a file and a subdir. Profiles ARE subdirs. Most of our existing profiles are stacked in this way. This would become less-so if we went with the mix-in approach, but it wouldn't be entirely flat in this p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-07-03, o godz. 14:07:28 Peter Stuge napisał(a): > Michał Górny wrote: > > The arch/ tree starts with 'generic' subdirectories matching main > > arches -- like arm, mips, x86, sparc, powerpc, s390 (but not amd64). > > I like this idea, but.. > > > > Each of arch trees contains an 'abi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Peter Stuge
Michał Górny wrote: > The arch/ tree starts with 'generic' subdirectories matching main > arches -- like arm, mips, x86, sparc, powerpc, s390 (but not amd64). I like this idea, but.. > Each of arch trees contains an 'abis' subtree that contains mix-ins ..please please call this 'abi' instead.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-06-25, o godz. 13:01:48 Ian Stakenvicius napisał(a): > I would like to propose adding 'no-multilib/[arch]/package.mask' > sub-profile(s), to allow all of these masks to go in one place. > > Populating package.mask should be fairly easy for amd64 at least, > since anything depending on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-07-03, o godz. 09:05:47 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> napisał(a): > Jonathan Callen posted on Thu, 03 Jul 2014 03:05:46 -0400 as excerpted: > > > I did, however test when a package installs two (different) regular > > files into paths that end up symlinked, and found that portage does >

Re: [gentoo-dev] About DELL ALPS touchpad

2014-07-03 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
taozhijiang schrieb: > Hello, everyone > > I am using DELL Latitiude Laptop, comes with ALPS touchpad. > > When I installed the driver in Windows, this touchpad supports > multi-touch very well. > I am now using the latest Gentoo with KDE descktop environment, and I > also want to > enjoy the m

[gentoo-dev] Re: Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Duncan
Jonathan Callen posted on Thu, 03 Jul 2014 03:05:46 -0400 as excerpted: > I did, however test when a package installs two (different) regular > files into paths that end up symlinked, and found that portage does > break in that case (as the only sensible option at that point is to > fail, as somet

[gentoo-dev] Re: new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Martin Vaeth
Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > >> The idea being that, in /etc/make.conf (or wherever >> that file is now), you'd define $PROFILE like this: >> >> linux-mips o32 uclibc server: >> PROFILE="base:kernel/linux:arch/mips:[...]" > > What about making /etc/portage/make.profile a directory > rather than

[gentoo-dev] Re: new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Duncan
Michael Haubenwallner posted on Thu, 03 Jul 2014 09:00:18 +0200 as excerpted: > What about making /etc/portage/make.profile a directory rather than a > symlink, having /etc/portage/make.profile/parent to reference all the > flavours? We /almost/ have that already. I've long thought that /etc/por

Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 07/03/2014 03:00, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > On 07/03/2014 08:18 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> On 07/02/2014 13:54, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16 >> [snip] >>> >>> I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without >>> understanding most of the cur

Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 07/03/2014 03:32, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-07-03, o godz. 02:18:23 > Joshua Kinard napisał(a): > >> [...] >> >> And so on. The goal was to have profiles/ be extremely flat, with limited >> nesting only for categorization purposes. Each component would contain all >> of the information

Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-07-03, o godz. 02:18:23 Joshua Kinard napisał(a): > [...] > > And so on. The goal was to have profiles/ be extremely flat, with limited > nesting only for categorization purposes. Each component would contain all > of the information specific to that component, and rely on OOP-like >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Making a common sub-profile for no-multilib

2014-07-03 Thread Jonathan Callen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/03/2014 12:59 AM, Duncan wrote: > Jonathan Callen posted on Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:06:59 -0400 as > excerpted: > >> On 07/02/2014 02:14 PM, Duncan wrote: >>> Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:30:50 -0400 as >>> excerpted: >>> Some

Re: [gentoo-dev] new profile layout with flavors and mix-ins

2014-07-03 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 07/03/2014 08:18 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 07/02/2014 13:54, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2014-07-02, o godz. 10:44:16 > [snip] >> >> I don't feel like we ought to vote on something like this without >> understanding most of the current profiles. And I'm afraid there are >> only few people w