Brian Harring wrote:
> Ebuilds are non-interactive compile/install... that's the design, and
> intention of them.
Sure, I thought that RESTRICT=interactive would just tell the user that
she would have to provide some feedback in cases like those that
wolf31o2 mentioned ("games from CD").
> I don
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:23 -0500, Brian Harring wrote:
> C) 15 hour upgrade/build, hanging an hour into it is going to be an
> ass biter.
This is actually why I've been doing something I would normally *not* do
and have been breaking up some games ebuilds that require a CD into a
$foo and $foo-d
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 17:51 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
> | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
> | use-flag based RE
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Jan Kundr?t wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
> > | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If on
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 19:39 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
> > | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only ther
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
> | would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
> | use-flag based RESTRICT...
>
> No, because then tha
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
| would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
| use-flag based RESTRICT...
No, because then that would encourage even more people
maillog: 03/10/2005-08:56:57(-0400): Chris Gianelloni types
> On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
> >
> > Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
> > into some interactivity. I was unde
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
>
> Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
> into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
> supposed to be completely autonomou
2.10.2005, 20:13:52, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:01:08PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> | On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
| >> Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| >> are broken. They ask you to
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:02:02PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| | are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
| | tests if I'm not mistaken
|
| Yup. There're quite a few broken test packages in the
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 08:01:08PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
| > Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
| > are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
| > tests if I'
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 19:50:53 +0200 "Fernando J. Pereda"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| | | Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796)
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> Also when FEATURES="test" ? In such case the mod_php and php packages
> are broken. They ask you to save, reject or send the result of the
> tests if I'm not mistaken
Even if they succeed? The point of test is to get some additi
This is what I have found thanks to research of friendly people!
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/29810 (pkg_config
only interactive)
and, somewhere in dev manual it does say test can be interactive
also.. not sure about that though
On 10/2/05, Fernando J. Pereda <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 06:41:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| | Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
| | into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
| | suppose
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:21:58 -0400 Dan Meltzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
| into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
| supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should
| take place
Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible.
Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran
into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was
supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should
take place in ebuild ... conf
18 matches
Mail list logo
