[gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
I'm trying to find the best fix for Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization request' % cpv format. Here are some options I see: a) keep '%s:' as is b) change to just '%s' c) change to '=%s:' d) change to '=%s' e) something

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/05/2015 02:01 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. > > Here are some options I see: > > a) keep '%s:' as is > b)

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/05/2015 03:03 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > I've settled on using a colon i.e. "jer format." If the bug references a > specific version (range), then I use =, >=, etc. appropriately. In the > case of stabilization bugs, I'd throw in the "=". > > So, (c). > Crap, I flipped a bit. I remem

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6 March 2015 at 09:03, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > I've settled on using a colon i.e. "jer format." If the bug references a > specific version (range), then I use =, >=, etc. appropriately. In the > case of stabilization bugs, I'd throw in the "=". > I was under the impression adding "=" was ju

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 05 Mar 2015 20:01, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. > > Here are some options I see: > > a) keep '%s:' as is > b) ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-06 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:01:23 +0100 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. > > Here are some options I see: > > a) keep '%s:

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-06 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:20:23 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > So jer format is something like "%s - foo". Yes. I now have a format named after me. > I guess I subconsciously reverted to using a colon because that's what > makes the most sense to me. But there is a little ambiguity with slots > i

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. The Emacs team used to have a stabilisation template with summar

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:01 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > What is your preference? Let's agree on something and avoid unnecessary > changes on bugzilla. Out of curiousity, what makes the changes necessary in the first place? It seems like an incredible amount of effort is going into standar

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-06 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:55:13AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > Out of curiousity, what makes the changes necessary in the first > place? It seems like an incredible amount of effort is going into > standardizing the format of textual summary lines and perhaps the > simplest solution is to just no

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-06 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > It doesn't hurt to have a recommendation, and personally I really appreciate > when people (yes, that includes developers and wranglers ;-) update the line > to be more informative. There already is a recommendation on the wiki, part > of t

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-07 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:27:38 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > but if people are suffering burnout over editing the line it this > doesn't seem like the biggest value-add to me. That didn't happen. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-10 Thread Markos Chandras
On 03/06/2015 07:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> >> It doesn't hurt to have a recommendation, and personally I really appreciate >> when people (yes, that includes developers and wranglers ;-) update the line >> to be more informative. There al

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

2015-03-13 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:58:06 + Markos Chandras wrote: > Would it be terribly difficult to set a template in the "Summary" > field whenever the "Keywording and Stabilization" component is > selected when filing a bug? No, just very naive. Just today I caught yet another fresh keywording requ