to ignore the digests since
it only needs the new-style manifest:
rsync --exclude '**/files/digest*' --delete-excluded
(3) users get immediate benefit. we can keep running in this mode
as long as necessary before completely deprecating the digest
ecessitate a cascading update to all the
ebuilds. Hence the current policy, however inaccurate the results
might be.
So right now the policy is broken, but the apparent alternative is
unmanageable. Ideas?
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpkKPYjeiMnW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Robin H. Johnson wrote: [Thu Jul 07 2005, 05:07:06PM EDT]
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:49:13PM -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Current (possibly unwritten) policy:
> > - eclasses declare USE-flags they honor in their own IUSE
> > - ebuilds declare USE-flags they ho
Vapier wrote: [Thu Jul 07 2005, 06:13:06PM EDT]
> On Thursday 07 July 2005 04:49 pm, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Current (possibly unwritten) policy:
> >
> > - eclasses declare USE-flags they honor in their own IUSE
> > - ebuilds declare USE-flags they honor in their
ge looks good.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpzzTOse0cYj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d of the browserplugin
USE-flag. Karl, does this make sense from your perspective for the
java stuff?
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpS5vPFdFhef.pgp
Description: PGP signature
7;s nothing to do here.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpr4Wf76l8Kq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ldn't be handled by the same USE-flag.
I haven't seen a response from you regarding this. What are your
thoughts?
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp7wnuAWk49B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Chris Gianelloni wrote:[Tue Jul 12 2005, 11:53:57AM EDT]
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:41 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > Karl,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > What are your thoughts?
>
> use nsplugin?
Chris, since when are you Karl? :-b
Regards,
Aron
Catching up on your inbox, foser? ;-)
foser wrote:[Mon Aug 01 2005, 01:06:10PM EDT]
> On Sat, 2005-06-11 at 14:46 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > foser wrote:[Sat Jun 11 2005, 04:15:22AM EDT]
> > > Arch keywords are concepts and as such may not primarily be d
"--" >&2
repoman commit -m "$msg" || return 1
if [[ -x /usr/bin/eviewcvs ]]; then
local f entry=$(perl -00ne '/^ \d/ and print, last' ChangeLog)
entry=${entry%%:*}
entry=${entry##*>}
entry=${entry//,/ }
for f in $entry; do
ord to sort KEYWORDS.
IMHO the best thing is to re-investigate GLEP 31 when the council is
formed. (At least I am under the impression that the council will
have the authority to make decisions like this, after appropriate
discussion and objections are heard)
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
G
nking, please point it out in case I fall into the same
> trap in some other instance.
You might be right. I wasn't aware that GLEP 31 was approved before
it was withdrawn.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp2qJCbzyyD7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
erested in maintaining this
package? See bug 97574
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp0x1YzarDNY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
se go ahead, this is the right thing to do.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp93vXsbU6LV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mply forgotten. ;-)
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpylFV2wRbt4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
meeting in before then.
It's not something that I do often... in fact, I've never been out of
email contact for 2 weeks solid since I started as a dev! It just
happens to coincide with the first month of the council's existence.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
g available at
http://gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20050915.txt
Please post follow-ups to gentoo-council ML (subscription required)
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpFWsVRuq3Fp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
you put these in package.mask?
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgp4V1gCmR7oy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
state. It's purely
a matter of
echo 'dev-util/mercurial' >> /etc/portage/package.unmask
So far I find myself agreeing with Ciaran's idea in this thread.
I don't see the point (yet) in more than three states.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgppgsKoBkwrJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
echo "!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status
message." >&2
> echo >&2
> + for x in $EBUILD_DEATH_HOOKS; do
> + ${x} "$1" "$2" "$3"
> + done
> exit 1
> }
Is th
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpMChTCnkgcz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ing the existing global
USE=nsplugin
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpf0XOVG3cTU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e.
Will do, thanks.
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpiVF2ibVwS6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thomas Matthijs wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT]
> You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it.
> Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change.
All set. The only place browserplugin is mentioned is in the
ChangeLogs.
Regards,
Aron
--
A
g is marked as deprecated in
use.local.desc
Regards,
Aron
--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpupH3V2Ck53.pgp
Description: PGP signature
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
