Re: [gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-27 Thread Burak Arslan
On 12/27/13 08:50, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: > On Freitag, 27. Dezember 2013, 00:42:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> What column in htop shows that number? >> >> top, htop, and all their friends do not display what most people assume >> they display. Modern OSes (for more than a decade now) manage memo

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-27 Thread Alexander Puchmayr
On Freitag, 27. Dezember 2013, 00:42:06 Alan McKinnon wrote: > What column in htop shows that number? > > top, htop, and all their friends do not display what most people assume > they display. Modern OSes (for more than a decade now) manage memory in > a way that makes it impossible to answer "h

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-26 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 26/12/2013 21:13, Alexander Puchmayr wrote: > Hi there, > > How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? > I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes > occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. > > Memory leak? > > Ver

[gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-26 Thread Alexander Puchmayr
Hi there, How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. Memory leak? Versions involved: dev-db/virtuoso-server-6.1.6 kde-base/kde-meta-4.

[gentoo-user] KDE nepomuk memory usage

2013-12-26 Thread Alexander Puchmayr
Hi there, How many memory is reasonable for virtuoso to use? I just had a view via htop, and I was surprised to see virtuoso-t processes occupying more than 1.5 GB (!), althoug there is a maximum of 128MB defined. Memory leak? Versions involved: dev-db/virtuoso-server-6.1.6 kde-base/kde-meta-4.