Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:38:21 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I cheated and just shared /usrportage, distfiles and all. I wasn't
to clear on what I was doing in my reply up there.
Even $PKGDIR? That's not a good idea unless you have identical
hardware and USE fla
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:38:21 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I cheated and just shared /usrportage, distfiles and all. I wasn't
> > > to clear on what I was doing in my reply up there.
> >
> > Even $PKGDIR? That's not a good idea unless you have identical
> > hardware and USE flags.
>
> B
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 22:38:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:26:22 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > > You may do if you put $PORTDIR on NFS, but I am only sharing $DISTDIR.
> >
> > I cheated and just shared /usrportage, distfiles and all. I wasn't to
> > clear on what I was doing in my r
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:16:58 -0500, Dale wrote:
Even $PKGDIR? That's not a good idea unless you have identical
hardware and USE flags.
I didn't save those back then. I very rarely use the -K option
anyway. I build them now but I only used it once in the pa
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:16:58 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Even $PKGDIR? That's not a good idea unless you have identical
> > hardware and USE flags.
> I didn't save those back then. I very rarely use the -K option
> anyway. I build them now but I only used it once in the past couple
> years. It's lik
Am 06.04.2011 01:09, schrieb Dale:
> Gregory Fontenele wrote:
>> how it came out of that list?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Atenciosamente,
>> Gregory Fontenele
>
> Are you on a loop or something? Same post to several threads now.
> What's up?
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
well, it is differnt this time. I allrea
Gregory Fontenele wrote:
how it came out of that list?
--
Atenciosamente,
Gregory Fontenele
Are you on a loop or something? Same post to several threads now.
What's up?
Dale
:-) :-)
how it came out of that list?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 19:16, Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:26:22 -0500, Dale wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> You may do if you put $PORTDIR on NFS, but I am only sharing $DISTDIR.
>>>
>>
>>> I cheated and just shared /usrportage, dist
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:26:22 -0500, Dale wrote:
You may do if you put $PORTDIR on NFS, but I am only sharing $DISTDIR.
I cheated and just shared /usrportage, distfiles and all. I wasn't to
clear on what I was doing in my reply up there.
Even $PKGDIR
how it came out of that list?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 18:38, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:26:22 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
> > > You may do if you put $PORTDIR on NFS, but I am only sharing $DISTDIR.
>
> > I cheated and just shared /usrportage, distfiles and all. I wasn't to
> > clear
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:26:22 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > You may do if you put $PORTDIR on NFS, but I am only sharing $DISTDIR.
> I cheated and just shared /usrportage, distfiles and all. I wasn't to
> clear on what I was doing in my reply up there.
Even $PKGDIR? That's not a good idea unless you h
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:48:50 -0500, Dale wrote:
Alternatively, use an NFS mount as $DISTDIR and you don't end up with
copies of the tarballs on every machine on the network.
I did that once and I don't recall having any problems. I had 4 rigs
plus a really
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:48:50 -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Alternatively, use an NFS mount as $DISTDIR and you don't end up with
> > copies of the tarballs on every machine on the network.
> I did that once and I don't recall having any problems. I had 4 rigs
> plus a really slow dial-up connection.
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:38:06 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
for the distfiles http-replicator is great. Example:
Box one has the tarball. Box 2, 3 and 4 can download it as well. Box
one does not have the tarball. Box 2 may search for it, box one will
download it and give it to
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:38:06 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
> > for the distfiles http-replicator is great. Example:
> > Box one has the tarball. Box 2, 3 and 4 can download it as well. Box
> > one does not have the tarball. Box 2 may search for it, box one will
> > download it and give it to box 2. Then
On 04/05/11 19:53, KH wrote:
> Am 05.04.2011 11:46, schrieb Jake Moe:
>> On 04/05/11 18:14, KH wrote:
>>> Am 04.04.2011 21:30, schrieb Peter Humphrey:
On Monday 04 April 2011 19:12:03 William Kenworthy wrote:
> I dont think http-replicator can manage a directory structure - are you
>>
Am 05.04.2011 11:46, schrieb Jake Moe:
> On 04/05/11 18:14, KH wrote:
>> Am 04.04.2011 21:30, schrieb Peter Humphrey:
>>> On Monday 04 April 2011 19:12:03 William Kenworthy wrote:
>>>
I dont think http-replicator can manage a directory structure - are you
trying to do something fancier th
On 04/05/11 18:14, KH wrote:
> Am 04.04.2011 21:30, schrieb Peter Humphrey:
>> On Monday 04 April 2011 19:12:03 William Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>>> I dont think http-replicator can manage a directory structure - are you
>>> trying to do something fancier than just serving out tarballs?
>> Yes; I want i
Am 04.04.2011 21:30, schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> On Monday 04 April 2011 19:12:03 William Kenworthy wrote:
>
>> I dont think http-replicator can manage a directory structure - are you
>> trying to do something fancier than just serving out tarballs?
>
> Yes; I want it to mirror my portage tree and
On Monday 04 April 2011 19:12:03 William Kenworthy wrote:
> I dont think http-replicator can manage a directory structure - are you
> trying to do something fancier than just serving out tarballs?
Yes; I want it to mirror my portage tree and serve it to other boxes on the
LAN.
It used to do thi
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 16:22 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello again list,
>
> Will someone who knows please tell me what permissions I need to give the
> /usr/portage tree for http-replicator to manage it? I've started with chown
> -R
> portage:portage /usr/portage but that may not be ideal.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello again list,
Will someone who knows please tell me what permissions I need to give the
/usr/portage tree for http-replicator to manage it? I've started with chown -R
portage:portage /usr/portage but that may not be ideal.
TIA
This is mine:
drwxr-xr-x 163 root
Hello again list,
Will someone who knows please tell me what permissions I need to give the
/usr/portage tree for http-replicator to manage it? I've started with chown -R
portage:portage /usr/portage but that may not be ideal.
TIA
--
Rgds
Peter
23 matches
Mail list logo
