[gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-29 Thread maxim wexler
Hi group, The new kernel panics at a typical place: <...> VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (8,7) then just below this appears: <6> Time: tsc clocksource has been installed. The root fs is reiserfs and *is* part of the kernel. Yes, CONFIG_UNIX=y I thought it might be the SATA dri

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-30 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Montag, 30. April 2007, maxim wexler wrote: > Hi group, > > The new kernel panics at a typical place: > <...> > VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (8,7) > > then just below this appears: > > <6> Time: tsc clocksource has been installed. > > > The root fs is reiserfs and *is* part of

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-30 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 30. April 2007 schrieb ext maxim wexler: > Hi group, > > The new kernel panics at a typical place: > <...> > VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block (8,7) > > From the new, 2.6.20 .config: > > CONFIG_SCSI=y > CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SD=y > CONFIG_ATA=y > CONFIG_SATA_SIL=y > > From the previ

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-30 Thread maxim wexler
--- Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Montag, 30. April 2007 schrieb ext maxim wexler: > > Hi group, > > > > The new kernel panics at a typical place: > > <...> > > VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown-block > (8,7) > > > > From the new, 2.6.20 .config: > > > > CONFIG_SCSI=y > > C

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-30 Thread maxim wexler
> > Yes, CONFIG_UNIX=y > > that is not the reiserfs option. I'm aware of that. But another PC with the 2.6.19 kernel and an IDE drive panicked until I set CONFIG_UNIX=y. Didn't help in this case. -mw __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail h

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-30 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Montag, 30. April 2007, maxim wexler wrote: > > > Yes, CONFIG_UNIX=y > > > > that is not the reiserfs option. > > I'm aware of that. But another PC with the 2.6.19 > kernel and an IDE drive panicked until I set > CONFIG_UNIX=y. Didn't help in this case. well, you should have set sockets, becaus

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-30 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi, Am Montag, den 30.04.2007, 17:24 +0200 schrieb Hemmann, Volker Armin: > On Montag, 30. April 2007, maxim wexler wrote: > > > > Yes, CONFIG_UNIX=y > > > > > > that is not the reiserfs option. > > > > I'm aware of that. But another PC with the 2.6.19 > > kernel and an IDE drive panicked until I

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message

2007-04-30 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Montag, 30. April 2007, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote: > > Nope, Unix sockets are usually not the commonly chosen way for > kernel<->userland communication. They're used for machine-local (w/ > exception of clusters) inter-process communication. But I think that > init would struggle w/o CONFIG_UNIX

Re: [gentoo-user] kernel 2.6.20-r6 panics with strange message FIXED

2007-04-30 Thread maxim wexler
> about your problem - do make menuconfig and recheck > your driver and fs > settings. It was a driver. In the 2.6.16 config under # #SCSI low-level drivers # I had this: CONFIG_SCSI_SATA_NV=y But for the 2.6.20 this option has been moved to # #Serial ATA (prod) and Parallel ATA (experimental