On Saturday, April 11, 2015 10:22:09 AM Alan Grimes wrote:
> My machine is so completely broken right now I can't open any new
> terminal sessions.
>
> This is because I stupidly tried to toggle tinfo useflag in a desperate
> attempt to get everything in my portage tree working again.
>
> Why now
On Saturday 11 April 2015 21:27:39 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Why don't you just start again from scratch, following the official docs?
> > You don't need to override every little setting; portage knows best, just
> > like your Ma. Use the force...
>
> Well, emptytree world see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Sonntag, 12. April 2015, 02:42:20 schrieb Alan Grimes:
>
> /etc/portage # emerge --info
> [[: error while loading shared libraries: libtinfo.so.5: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
> Failed to validate a sane '/dev'.
> ba
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 20:42:20 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Linux is crap, it takes all the talent I have to keep this piece of junk
> running. =(
So you either need less hacks in make.conf or more talent, you decide
which...
--
Neil Bothwick
BBS: (n.) a system for connecting computers and excha
On Saturday, April 11, 2015 08:42:20 PM Alan Grimes wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > > 2. LD cannot find ncurses, -- It simply can't, in 64 bit mode either.
> > > That is the only error message it ever gives and vast amount of effort
> > > spent in sessions over the last year and a half ha
Alan Grimes wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>> If you kept your system updated all the time, you shouldnt have any
>> problems.
> Byte me.
>
> Linux is crap, it takes all the talent I have to keep this piece of junk
> running. =( I'm the user here, I am not going to take any lip from you
> abo
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 11 April 2015 10:22:09 Alan Grimes wrote:
>
>> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
>> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
>> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who pushed
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Saturday, April 11, 2015 10:22:09 AM Alan Grimes wrote:
>> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
>> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
>> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who
On Saturday 11 April 2015 20:42:20 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Linux is crap, it takes all the talent I have to keep this piece of junk
> running.
Just don't bother, and save the rest of us some earache.
[Apologies to those who recognised the troll.)
--
Rgds
Peter
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> > 1. My machine is not correctly configured to build 32 bit executables,
> > mainly because I cannot find a 32 bit version of ncurses that ld is
> > willing to acknowledge the existence of.
>
> This seems to be working for just about everyone else. So mayb
On Saturday 11 April 2015 10:22:09 Alan Grimes wrote:
> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who pushed out
> the changes to portage
On Saturday, April 11, 2015 10:22:09 AM Alan Grimes wrote:
> Right now my system is completely unusable and will need fresh stage3
> packages followed by an emerge emptytree to recover. But before I can do
> that, I need a sane profile and to know that the person who pushed out
> the changes to por
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:41:28 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> >> 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit
> >> enabled. ALARM: ABI_x86 should be set in exactly one place:
> >> /etc/portage/make.conf and nowhere else. But, nevertheless, ABI_x86
> >> WAS set which broke the profile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Alan,
> 1. My machine is not correctly configured to build 32 bit executables,
> mainly because I cannot find a 32 bit version of ncurses that ld is
> willing to acknowledge the existence of.
This seems to be working for just about everyone els
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
>
>> And then portage did two things.
>>
>> 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that
>> go.
>>
>> 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit enabled.
>> ALARM: ABI_x86 s
On Saturday 11 Apr 2015 15:34:10 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > And then portage did two things.
> >
> > 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that
> > go.
> >
> > 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 w
On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:22:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> And then portage did two things.
>
> 1. It masked emul-linux -- A move that I support, it's time to see that
> go.
>
> 2. It sent out a profile that sets variable ABI_x86 with 32 bit enabled.
> ALARM: ABI_x86 should be set in exactly one p
My machine is so completely broken right now I can't open any new
terminal sessions.
This is because I stupidly tried to toggle tinfo useflag in a desperate
attempt to get everything in my portage tree working again.
Why now did nothing in my portage tree build?
It wasn't building for two reason
18 matches
Mail list logo
