Trenton Adams schreef:
> On 1/15/06, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trenton Adams schreef:
>>> On 1/14/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gnome carcharias rjf # emerge -pv mozilla-firefox
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Cal
On 1/15/06, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trenton Adams schreef:
> > On 1/14/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 1/14/06, Trenton Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> The old version could disable gnome, but 1.5 can't. Perhaps it's
> >>> a firefox 1.5 ebuild limitat
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:48:04 -0500, Dan wrote:
> > The presence of a USE flag may not change, but its default setting
> > can. If you have with no setting for mozilla in USE, emerge mozilla
> > and then do emerge --info, you'll see mozilla added to USE. Some
> > other packages have similar effects
Trenton Adams wrote:
On 1/14/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it's not the gnome use flag because I disable gnome in my use
flags. And besides, the firefox 1.5 ebuild does not use the gnome use
flag. And I added it for testing purposes to see if I could prevent
it from be
On 1/15/06, Trenton Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/14/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/14/06, Trenton Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The old version could disable gnome, but 1.5 can't. Perhaps it's a
> > > firefox 1.5 ebuild limitation? I hope that's what it i
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:28:10 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
The appearance of USE flags (which is what we're talking about) is
unrelated to whether or not you have the package installed already-- a
USE flag does not appear or disappear based on whether you have the
relevan
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:28:10 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
> The appearance of USE flags (which is what we're talking about) is
> unrelated to whether or not you have the package installed already-- a
> USE flag does not appear or disappear based on whether you have the
> relevant package installed.
Trenton Adams schreef:
> On 1/14/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 1/14/06, Trenton Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The old version could disable gnome, but 1.5 can't. Perhaps it's
>>> a firefox 1.5 ebuild limitation? I hope that's what it is,
>>> because I can't stand gnom
On 1/14/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/14/06, Trenton Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The old version could disable gnome, but 1.5 can't. Perhaps it's a
> > firefox 1.5 ebuild limitation? I hope that's what it is, because I
> > can't stand gnome.
>
> False.
>
> carcharias
On 1/14/06, Trenton Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The old version could disable gnome, but 1.5 can't. Perhaps it's a
> firefox 1.5 ebuild limitation? I hope that's what it is, because I
> can't stand gnome.
False.
carcharias rjf # ldd /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox-bin | grep gnome
carc
On 1/14/06, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trenton Adams schreef:
> >
> > The old version could disable gnome, but 1.5 can't. Perhaps it's a
> > firefox 1.5 ebuild limitation? I hope that's what it is, because I
> > can't stand gnome.
>
> No, it has nothing to do with the ebuild, it'
Trenton Adams schreef:
>
> The old version could disable gnome, but 1.5 can't. Perhaps it's a
> firefox 1.5 ebuild limitation? I hope that's what it is, because I
> can't stand gnome.
No, it has nothing to do with the ebuild, it's a choice of the
Mozilla.org developers. But perhaps you misse
On 1/13/06, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trenton Adams schreef:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm just curious about something. I installed mozilla-firefox-bin,
> > and I got what I *thought* was the gnome open/save dialog. And I
> > absolutely I can't stand that thing. So, I decided to
On 1/14/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Murray wrote:
> > Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> So the reason why the open/save dialogs are the same is because they use
> >> the same resources (GTK settings, many of which can be set in GNOME).
> >
> > Yet the pr
Graham Murray wrote:
> Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So the reason why the open/save dialogs are the same is because they use
>> the same resources (GTK settings, many of which can be set in GNOME).
>
> Yet the previous versions of mozilla-firefox did not use this open/save
> dia
Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So the reason why the open/save dialogs are the same is because they use
> the same resources (GTK settings, many of which can be set in GNOME).
Yet the previous versions of mozilla-firefox did not use this open/save
dialog. Or is it an gtk upgrade whic
On 1/13/06, Trenton Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm just curious about something. I installed mozilla-firefox-bin,
> and I got what I *thought* was the gnome open/save dialog. And I
> absolutely I can't stand that thing.
This is what happens when "usability experts" desig
Trenton Adams schreef:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm just curious about something. I installed mozilla-firefox-bin,
> and I got what I *thought* was the gnome open/save dialog. And I
> absolutely I can't stand that thing. So, I decided to compile
> mozilla-firefox for myself, as I have "-gnome" in
Hi everyone,
I'm just curious about something. I installed mozilla-firefox-bin,
and I got what I *thought* was the gnome open/save dialog. And I
absolutely I can't stand that thing. So, I decided to compile
mozilla-firefox for myself, as I have "-gnome" in my use flags. Well
for some reason, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
