On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> On 18/11/12 22:20, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> The OpenJDK7 will be useful instead for catching misuse of Treeset and
>> for tests that have execution order dependencies (that is, the work if you
>> run methodA
On 18/11/12 22:20, Andrea Aime wrote:
> The OpenJDK7 will be useful instead for catching misuse of Treeset and
> for tests that have execution order dependencies (that is, the work if you
> run methodA, methodB, methodC, but fail if you run methodB, methodC,
> methodA)
Great work, Andrea, much app
Thanks a lot, Jody, this has been a huge effort.
Great success!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J88-RdWnNT0
I just fixed a test compile failure in gt-webservice (unsupported; we
build it on our Jenkins), replacing a size method with
DataUtilities.count . Yes, *another* size method, who would hav
Tough problem, providing an alternate solution for discussion only (not
criticism of your two ideas).
> However that has some limitations, in that we could support only
> one image filter per feature type style, whilst Mapnik supports
> a chain of them.
> They actually do that in a single attrib
Hi,
finally managed to make both GeoTools and GeoServer build on OpenJDK7,
as a result the OpenJDK7 has been setup to start sending mails out to the
"extra builds" mailing lists:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/geoserver-extra-builds
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/geotools-extra-bu
Jody Garn
Andrea reports that *community* has been missed from the feature collection
cleanup.
--
Jody Garnett
On Saturday, 17 November 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> GeoServer pull request rebased, and applied to master.
>
> Hudson reports success:
> - http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/g
