[Gimp-developer] Refactoring?

2004-05-08 Thread Robin Rowe
Would like to better understand the development approach the GIMP has used over the years to segregate code in the main app from code in libgimp. Seem to recall seeing some app code that had moved into libgimp, but am not sure. Do GIMP maintainers later refactor code? Does code in app ever get mov

Re: [Gimp-developer] Another new image dialog mockup

2004-05-08 Thread Branko Collin
On 8 May 2004, at 19:51, Jakub Steiner wrote: > On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 21:06 -0700, Nathan Carl Summers wrote: > > I took a look at the new image dialogs on the list today, and I made > > a few improvements. I've posted them at > > http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogSimple.png and > > http://wi

Re: [Gimp-developer] Another new image dialog mockup

2004-05-08 Thread Jakub Steiner
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 21:06 -0700, Nathan Carl Summers wrote: > I took a look at the new image dialogs on the list today, and I made a few > improvements. I've posted them at > http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogSimple.png and > http://wilber.gimp.org/~rock/NewDialogExpanded.png To only give y

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-08 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 12:09, Michael Schumacher wrote: > Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > But seeing the waste amount of bugs filed primarily for win32 installers > > since we released 2.0.0 I am slowly starting to change my mind. Perhaps > > a '3rd party installer' or similar component should

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-08 Thread Michael Schumacher
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: Hi, On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:50, Sven Neumann wrote: Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify the projec

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-08 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 17:50, Sven Neumann wrote: > Because we can't do anything about the bugs. Nobody but the packager > can. The situation would be different if the tools used to build the > binary packages would be in GNOME CVS. That would certainly qualify > the project for also using the

Re: [Gimp-developer] reporting bugs on builds

2004-05-08 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 01:49, Sven Neumann wrote: > Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What about a component "installers" or "binary packages" where we > > can put the bugs that are related to a certain gimp distribution? > > If the maintainers of the "installers" or "binary packages