On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Robert Dailey wrote:
>
> Would be nice in the future to have another revision specification
> like @{wc} for "HEAD + working copy". I guess this technically isn't a
> revision, but something along those lines. Or maybe just an
>
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Robert Dailey wrote:
> Thanks Junio, I forgot about merge-base. I'll create some aliases for now:
>
> # Diff Branch
> db = "!f() { : git diff ; git diff $(git merge-base @{upstream}
> HEAD) ; }; f"
>
> # Diff Tool Branch
>
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Robert Dailey writes:
>
>> So for a topic branch based on master, I can diff ONLY my changes on
>> the topic branch by doing this simple command:
>>
>> $ git diff origin/master...
>>
>> However,
Robert Dailey writes:
> So for a topic branch based on master, I can diff ONLY my changes on
> the topic branch by doing this simple command:
>
> $ git diff origin/master...
>
> However, this does not include uncommitted working copy changes. To
> work around this, I
So for a topic branch based on master, I can diff ONLY my changes on
the topic branch by doing this simple command:
$ git diff origin/master...
However, this does not include uncommitted working copy changes. To
work around this, I can do this instead:
$ git diff origin/master
(No three-dot
5 matches
Mail list logo