At the (minor) cost of dropping compatibility with
3.03, I've checked in a fix for this. Should appear
overnight.
--sigbjorn
George Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Currently (I have the latest version of everything) if I do
> this naively it falls over because the Makefile contains
George Russell wrote:
> Currently (I have the latest version of everything) if I do this
> naively it falls over because the Makefile contains ihc commands
> and the code ihc produces contains _stdcall's, which ghc doesn't
> seem to understand.
I noticed the same during the build of HDirect RPMs.
Currently (I have the latest version of everything) if I do this naively
it falls over because the Makefile contains ihc commands
and the code ihc produces contains _stdcall's, which ghc doesn't seem
to understand. If however I modify the ihc commands to use -g, everything
goes swimmingly. Am
Michael Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> I wouldn't mind working on this, but I know very little about the SPARC
> architecture, or the calling conventions. (I don't even know if the
> stack grows up or down.) I took a look at the assembly output of gcc and
> got an idea of what's going on, but
Hi!
I attached a patch that does some additional cleanups to a build tree
(equiv.: makes the packager's life easier ;-))
I wasn't sure, which files should go into $(CLEAN_FILES) and which into
$(MAINTAINER_CLEAN_FILES), maybe someone could have a look at my choice.
regarding the perl scripts: t
