On 06/12/12 22:11, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
So are you going to add the two missing MachOps, MO_UF_Conv & MO_FU_Conv?
I'm trying to add those. I'm now thinking that I will use C calls
(which is still much faster than going via Integer) instead of
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
> So are you going to add the two missing MachOps, MO_UF_Conv & MO_FU_Conv?
I'm trying to add those. I'm now thinking that I will use C calls
(which is still much faster than going via Integer) instead of
emitting some assembly, as the former is
On 06/12/12 00:29, Johan Tibell wrote:
Hi!
I'm trying to implement word2Double# and I've looked at how e.g. LLVM
does it. LLVM outputs quite clever branchless code that uses two
predefined constants in the .data section. Is it possible to add
contents to the current .data section from a function
Hi!
I'm trying to implement word2Double# and I've looked at how e.g. LLVM
does it. LLVM outputs quite clever branchless code that uses two
predefined constants in the .data section. Is it possible to add
contents to the current .data section from a function in the NatM
monad e.g.
coerceWord2F
