The detail in this response is much appreciated. Thank you.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> For Fedora/RHEL/CentOS rpms:
>
> + People file bugs, e.g. against Fedora/glusterfs or
> GlusterFS/packaging, and we fix them.
>
> + Some of us
On 06/28/2016 08:07 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
>
> I have a follow-up question on the production of these artifacts -
> when do we check whether the RPMs or, the images produced are sane?
> For example, that the RPMs are packaged well and as per specifications
> ...
>
For
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> Coincidentally I've asked Humble about the option to provide a container
> (and maybe VM) image through the CentOS Storage SIG. Just as with the
> packages, we should try to utilize the integration with different
>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
> All the rpm jobs are now in Jenkins job builder format. I've disabled the
> old jobs and replaced them with new ones:
>
> glusterfs-rpm -> rpm-fedora
> glusterfs-rpm-el6 -> rpm-el6
> glusterfs-devrpm -> devrpm-fedora
>
Hello,
All the rpm jobs are now in Jenkins job builder format. I've disabled the
old jobs and replaced them with new ones:
glusterfs-rpm -> rpm-fedora
glusterfs-rpm-el6 -> rpm-el6
glusterfs-devrpm -> devrpm-fedora
glusterfs-devrpm-el6 -> devrpm-el6
glusterfs-devrpm-el7 -> devrpm-el7
Please let