Dear all
I'm trying to assemble a topology entry for S-nitrosocysteine.
Searching through the examples in the PDB revealed quite a spread of
bond lengths and angles - the N=O bond ranges from 1.2 to 1.47A, for
example.
To get more rigorously derived figures, and to calculate charges, I
thought of
Dear all
Does anybody, by any chance, have a Gromacs topology file for a
nitrosylated cysteine residue? If not, is anybody aware of information
for this residue in other program packages, or will PRODRG be my best
bet?
Thanks in advance
Daniel
--
Dr Daniel John Rigden Tel
Dear all
Previously I (and others) have posted with issues regarding the
conversion of gromacs trajectories (nm) to amber format (Angstrom). You
can get g87 files form trjconv which are the same format as amber but in
the wrong units.
It turns out there is a simple way to do these conversions
Dear all
I'm trying to convert an xtc to an Amber (g87) trajectory. I don't have
the Amber package. trjconv makes a file which is read by the next
package but I strongly suspect the bounding box information is wrong
which in turn is likely to be to do with Gromacs working in nm, Amber in
A.
Fol
> Erik
>
> On Apr 23, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Daniel Rigden wrote:
>
> > Dear all
> >
> > I'm trying to compile the latest GROMACS 3.3.1 on the latest Ubuntu
> > Linux. Due to some fftw installation issue I used
> >
> > ./configure --with-fft=fftpa
Hi everyone
I'd like to convert my Gromacs trajectory to an Amber format for use
with the CAVER program. Reading round, it seems that Amber is
equivalent to the g87 format so I can use trjconv to produce the file.
This all seems to work well (the file gets read in and processed) except
for a prob
Dear all
I'm trying to compile the latest GROMACS 3.3.1 on the latest Ubuntu
Linux. Due to some fftw installation issue I used
./configure --with-fft=fftpack
make
make install
All seemed to work fine, but any program I try to run now gives me a
crash of this kind
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: g_clustsiz
Dear all
This is a general MD question I'm afraid but I think this the quickest
way to access an informed community.
I remember seeing a while back an article that said that although MD
simulations only extend to a timescale shorter than some biological
motions, that these motions are typically qu
8 matches
Mail list logo