I agree that two of these devices aren't entirely necessary unless we want
to use VPNs to access each site where they will eventually be installed. I
was thinking that it would be easy to stage them to check out how the VPN
tunnel would work and make any adjustments. The WAN side of the gateways
On 30 Mar 2003 20:08:05 -0500
Rob Lembree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Bill,
How about a talk about Python for an upcoming meeting?
Well, gee... (shuffling his feet)... I dunno... er,...
OK.
-Bill
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL
This is interesting, I had the exact same problem with an eracks machine, but
the pci=bios at the boot prompt fixed it for me. I installed with SuSe 8.1,
specified the pci=bios and all is well.
Ed
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 00:14, Kurth Bemis wrote:
here's the story...
bought a machine from
An update - when I hook a PC directly to the gateway and use a
cross-over cable, the VPN connection from the PC client works correctly
and I can access the systems inside the LAN behind the gateway (ping,
browse etc.). So I guess the two gateways hooked directly together
requires the use of a
That didn't do it.
I'm looking at my dmesg a bit more and I see somthing that strikes me as
kind of odd.
PCI: This system does not support PCI
I've never seen this before and I'm wondering what would cause this.
I'm going to go googling, but i'd be interested to hear what you all
have to
Not it - looked at that many times to make sure that it was
selected..and it is
i think that I'll try booting with linux pci=direct and see what happens
I'm going to load up the .20 kern and see if that does it..I noticed
that there were several PCI fixes and what not
~kurth
The 3Com documentation is pretty reasonable in describing how the tunnel
server assigns addresses to the incoming VPN connections. They take pains to
make sure that you don't overlap the VPN tunnel addresses and the DHCP
addresses that are served to the local systems. At the client end, packets
I understand that due to the association of certain people on this list,
such as Derek Martin, Alex Hewitt, me, JABR and brother Kenny, Paul
Lussier has been experiencing a rather high depletion of brain cells.
One potetial remedy for this is to drop your current ISP and join AOL or
MSN :-)
--
Paul Lussier wrote:
Memo: Potential depletion of lumineferous electrons
From: Paul Reisenfern, Director
Office of Health and Safety, Computer Division
To:All Computer Users
Date: 1 April 2003
As a result of recent studies carried out in cooperation with the
National
Check out mii-tool - it might help.
You can use it to query the current MII settings
and to nail them where they should be if they aren't
right. Sometimes two NICs fail to properly negotiate
their optimal settings and (say) a 100Mb-FD connection
might end up running at (say) 10Mb-HD. Worth a
Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Check out the CPAN. http://cpan.org/
Maybe my humor circuits have burned out, but... CPAN doesn't look a whole
lot different to me today than usual. (Though my Wanda the Gnome Fish
looks suspiciously dead...)
Hm. They must have put the original page back up. For a
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 15:20, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Maybe my humor circuits have burned out, but... CPAN doesn't look a whole
lot different to me today than usual. (Though my Wanda the Gnome Fish
looks suspiciously dead...)
OK So, 1) I'm not the only one that runs Wanda the Gnome Fish and
In a message dated: 01 Apr 2003 15:38:18 EST
Kenneth E. Lussier said:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 15:20, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Maybe my humor circuits have burned out, but... CPAN doesn't look a whole
lot different to me today than usual. (Though my Wanda the Gnome Fish
looks suspiciously
Believe it or not, disk I/O bandwidth is often the culprit in situations
like this. Try moving the same amount of data from disk to disk and see what
happens. Make sure you invalidate the cache if you do this in a loop to
overcome the effects of extensive read caching. I think you'll find that
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
Any hints/suggestions/etc., would be greatly appreciated.
Have you tried forcing the switch and network cards to 100/Full? Auto
Detection often has issues.
Ben
--
Make happy those who are near, and those who are far will come.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 20:25:50 -0500 (EST)
Ben Boulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Derek Martin wrote:
This is not entirely true. Many switches have ports that auto-sense
whether they should be crossed over or straight through...
Never heard of this - got any models I can
16 matches
Mail list logo
