From what I have been able to gather, it seems that GNOME is big in the USA,
but over in Europe it looks like KDE rules the desktop, I prefer KDE for my
personal taste over GNOME which seems more like WINDOWS and probably the
reason RED Hat it to convert Windoze users, KDE on the other hand in my
From what I have been able to gather, it seems that GNOME is big in the
USA, but over in Europe it looks like KDE rules the desktop, [...]
I've found that to be generally true too.
Myself, I loved reading Linus' rant
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/usability/2005-December/msg00022.html
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 09:55:57AM -0500, Adam Helbling wrote:
On 12/20/05, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/05, Adam Helbling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ya I recommended Hamachi to him.
http://www.hamachi.cc/
Interesting. Is there any particular reason one would
On Thursday 22 December 2005 10:08 am, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I don't know anything about Steve Gibson or what him liking it means,
but I'm listening to Steve's podcast now (since I got a 60GB iPod as a
Christmas present from work...) and he is *very* glowing about the
program.
I've heard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I gave up on Red Hat when they went to Blue Curve or whatever.
Red Hat never was behind KDE, and in fact was one of the original instigators
of GNOME, mostly due to the issues of QT and Trolltech.
I think both desktops (KDE and GNOME) have strengths, which is why I do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I prefer KDE for my personal taste over GNOME which seems more like WINDOWS
and probably the reason RED Hat it to convert Windoze users, KDE on the other
hand in my opinion, is crisp clean and refreshing.
Once upon a time, in the early days of Red Hat, Red Hat decided
On Thursday 22 December 2005 11:53 am, Jon maddog Hall wrote:
The winner was a very nice desktop, and Marc Ewing was going to use it as
the next Red Hat default desktop. I told him no, since what Red Hat
really wanted to do was get Windows users over, and Windows users wanted
something that
On 12/21/05, Chris Brenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 17:45 -0500, Thomas Charron wrote: On 12/21/05, Chris Brenton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't look to me like it's Microsoft who's doing the auctioning, but users who are able to send invites.From the link above:Microsoft
Thomas Charron wrote:
Article sure does say that, but the link they refer to lists a bunch
of *END USERS* selling off THEIR invites, not Microsoft.
Do we know that those end users aren't MS Employees? That we be the best!
Dude, I just wrote some buggy software for Billy. How much do you
Neil Joseph Schelly wrote:
I've heard Steve Gibson's name several times over the years. He's a
self-proclaimed Windows security expert mostly. He takes time to
analyze things very closely and has web pages that he's designed to
show you various potential security problems you can easily
Hi folks,
Up until now I've been fairly lucky in maintaining our IMAP server on
Cyrus. However, we've identified a project which we'd like to move
forward to better construct our mail architecture. When we proposed
this project to our VP of Engineering, he rightfully asked the
question of, Why
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:40:54PM -0500, Paul Lussier wrote:
In other words, he's more than happy to see the IT group sink rather
than swim. However, I'd rather do the right thing, just do the work
and not waste a bunch of people's time or the company's money with
failed (possibly
On Dec 22, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Dan Jenkins wrote:
Steve's main claim to fame, in my mind, is his program, SpinRite.
It would refresh a hard drive's format and often extend its life
considerably.
This was back in the MFM days. I do use some of his little security
patches, such as UnPnP, etc.
Those on this list may recall my recently having recommended NuFone as
a PSTN-VoIP gateway. I must now withdraw this recommendation.
I just found out that new NuFone accounts will be charged a monthly
fee (in ADDITION to the per minute rate) for DIDs. Existing accounts
(like mine) are exempt,
Mark Komarinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Why use exchange? No really. If all you want is an IMAP server,
what is the reason for using Exchange?
All *engineering* wants is an IMAP server. The business side already
has an Exchange server. The basic argument is, Why can't Engineering
Paul Lussier wrote:
Mark Komarinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Why use exchange? No really. If all you want is an IMAP
server, what is the reason for using Exchange?
All *engineering* wants is an IMAP server. The business side already
has an Exchange server. The basic argument is, Why
16 matches
Mail list logo
