On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 00:13 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> I have no knowledge of scheme and despite many appeals from Derek and others,
> I have absolutely no intention of learning it!
> I've been recommended to learn scheme so many times within gnucash but NEVER
> outside it. Why should new de
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 00:13 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> 1. Hard to follow code layout - src/engine in particular has caused lots of
> confusion on this list when trying to relate to QOF. CVS is the main problem
> here, preventing file system re-organisation. (I like CVS but I recognise
> it's
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 16:13 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Yeah, who knows what those numbers mean. But, there's a very
> noticable difference between a project that has a healthy development
> rate - even in maintenance mode - and one that doesn't. And we don't.
That is very true.
> I agree
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 21:05 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > 4. This isn't gnucash's fault but such a large project is a *difficult* one
> > to
> > take on. We can't reduce the codebase but I feel we all need to make it
> > easier for new developers to get "under the hood". One BIG problem for
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 14:23 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I think you may have missed the essential point. It's not the variety
> (or lack thereof) of code management techniques. It's the
> burdensomeness of *code management* tasks.
I didn't miss the point, I've been complaining about the over
I'm constantly forgetting or are unaware of what our target
distribution-releases are, and thus what library-versions that means we
are targetting. To help record all the details, I've added the file
README.dependencies to CVS, on the gnome2 branch.
http://cvs.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gnuca
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 10:40 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 12:22 am, Josh Sled wrote:
> > If you have any interest in programming, you should know lisp. Period.
>
> Rubbish !
>
> That's a myth propagated in university colleges that has
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 11:34 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> This is ALL because the current version control system relies on the final
> arbiter being a single directory on a single machine: cvs.gnucash.org.
No, it's not. It's because you're trying to extricate a lot of really
central code from a
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 16:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> You make it sound like I'm hijacking gnucash.
I don't believe that. I do believe you've been working at odds from
most of the other developers, making changes that others don't want
(right now) and breaking things from time to time. This
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 17:48 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> In the case of Debian, this isn't the way it goes. Don't target
> Debian sarge; target Debian unstable, which is in progress now.
>
> The freeze is expected sometime about a year from now.
Hmm, maybe I wasn't clear.
Especially sinc
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 17:59 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 16 October 2005 5:01 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Especially since it's been so long since the last release, we should
> > seek to make the next release one that can work on fielded systems. As
> > su
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 20:21 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> I'd much rather solve the problem with our link to goffice/gsf, if possible.
Yes.
> I'd hope we wouldn't have to, but if the dependency chain does halt at
> libgsf,
> that would work. Don't you think it's papering over the cracks though
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 12:05 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That's fine... we can get the new release into the process for the
> > future. But I'm primarily talking about a gnucash release that can be
> > compi
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 12:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Now some of what you've got above are gnome-2 libraries. Are we
> talking about a release of 1.8, or the G2 release?
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 12:59 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Of course I want to target the future, and have th
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 15:11 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I agree about the negative feedback, and about striving for quality.
> But generating code that results in negative feedback is way better
> than generating no code, and is beneficial. And if the feedback loop
> is such that code developm
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:28 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Thoughts? Comments?
This all sounds right and good.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:27 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
> My main question is now: How would you like to receive feedback?
The mailing list is the best place, right now.
You should look at the GNOME2_STATUS file to ensure that the problems
you are seeing are not expected nor well-known, but I
Recently we've been planning on moving the GnuCash repository from CVS to
Subversion. This week I've made the changes on cvs.gnucash.org to enable
anonymous and developer access to a subversion repository. This encompases:
- http-style anonymous access
- svn+ssh authenticated developer acce
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 18:50 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I tried to view a diff and got this:
Hmm, I read comments mentioning something like this, but didn't see it
myself. Admittedly, I didn't test too much.
In the last released viewcvs (0.9.4), the subversion support seems to be
broken. Th
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:23:13AM -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
Volker, thanks! This is quite helpful! :)
| Last not least (this is not related to SX) there is a menu option Misc
| --> Test available on the Accounts window. When selected this displays
| a window with the text
| 'testing
|
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:45:47PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
| Well, I think *all* development should be on branches.
Ick. Now we have to fight about the benefits of Continuous Integration. :)
(Strangely, its argument [1] has a similar form: "[...] fundamental shift
to the whole development
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 08:09:23PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
| So we agree, yes? :)
Sounds like we mostly do, yes. I don't think branches are needed for "all"
development, but they can be useful.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/jsled/ | a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL
PROTEC
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:16:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
| developers on code management. Some method of clearly attributing branches to
| particular goals beyond a short, cryptic, branch name.
"short, cryptic, branch name[s]" such as?
| 3. More acceptance that new developers don't nece
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 01:00:35PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
| On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:14:46AM -0400, Dan Widyono wrote:
| > So.
| >
| > Is it possible for me to jump in, pull SVN down, install SVN + SVK on my
| > workstation, diddle away using my own local personal branch, submit frequent
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:55:13PM -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
| Yes. Our web site needs 50-75% less words, and more appropriate ones.
FWIW, I had cause to go to the Evolution site [1] recently, and I consider
it a model of an excellent project site: pretty, clean, minimalist,
content-rich yet
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:50:36PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
| >>I can ask. I know he's been really really busy.. He might be
| >>amenable to some CVS/SVN push into the web server.. I don't know.
| >Something like
| >http://www.goshaky.com/goshaky-distfiles/svn2rss/
| >might be useful once SVN
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:04:51PM -0400, Tim Wunder wrote:
| In a related issue:
| It would seem to be a good idea to have the preferences dialog mirror the SX
| creation Options section.
True, and that makes sense; I'll need to talk to hampton to see if this
is readily possible, but I don't see
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 22:06 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2005 4:58 am, Brian Rose wrote:
>
> (switched to devel)
>From where? Where can I see the original message?
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 09:53 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 30 October 2005 2:44 am, Brian Rose wrote:
> > Hmm, I was hoping it would be possible to use
> > Gnucash via the desktop for one user
> > and via a webpage for another user
> > simultaneously--maybe that is a longer way off than
>
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 20:01 +0100, Didier Vidal wrote:
> I've always wondered why the commits are systematically sent to
> gnucash-patches... This results in noise and an additional chance to
> forget or loose patches (since no dedicated tool exists to manage them).
>
> Why not just sending the pa
Noticed during normal upgrade/build cycle (from a cvs update yesterday
evening, which was g2-latest), but I `make distclean`ed, re-autogen and
re-`make install`ed just to be sure...
... src/engine/{qof,gnc}la-dir.h is not being built:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/jsled/stuff/proj/gnucash
e.g
make[4]: Entering directory
`/home/jsled/stuff/proj/gnucash/src-g2/gnucash/src/backend/qsf'
source='qsf-backend.c' object='qsf-backend.lo' libtool=yes \
depfile='.deps/qsf-backend.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/qsf-backend.TPlo' \
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../../../depcomp \
/bin/sh ../../..
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 18:56 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Reasoning:
> X -patches should go to -devel.
> * All submitted patches should be up for discussion.
> * It's hard to know before hand what patches actually will generate
> discussion.
> * It's hard to move the
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 13:38 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> I would therefore propose that we decide on the transition to Subversion
> *now*, and that this transition should happen in the next 1-2 weeks.
+1.
> Additionally, I would propose that we stop the discussion of the SCM issue
> now
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:41 -0500, Volker Englisch wrote:
> David Hampton wrote:
> >>The default value for "Register lines" is set to 2. I think this
> >>value should be increased to display at least 3 lines in the
> >>Scheduled Transaction Editor.
> >
> >
> > I see this as a default
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 17:54 -0400, David Hampton wrote:
> I think my misunderstanding of the sx settings when I created the
> preferences may be contributing to the problem. Can you clarify for me
> whether my current understanding is correct. (Line numbers refer to the
> sxed dialog options sett
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 02:23 -0400, Volker Englisch wrote:
> I don't know if the scheduled transactions are ready for testing since
> they crash GC frequently but here are a few things I noticed:
"crash[ing] GC frequently" is generally not my experience with them,
currently. If possible, can you a
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:36 -0800, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
> I won't have time to try and fix these; I'm way behind on my Mathematics
> homework and should really be working on that instead...
>
> Hope this helps. Do yous have an AMD64 to test compile on?
Only vicariously through souls like yoursel
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 06:59 -0800, Brian Rose wrote:
> Hmmm, but is there anywhere that says in stuff
> like in version 2.5 we will have whatever,
> and in v. 3.0 will be these features as well. A
> current roadmap I guess. Is it not neccessary to
> have all this and the docs above on the/a websi
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 18:03 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> There are similar errors in qsf-xml-map.c and qsf-xml.c. Similar to the
> src/engine/gncla-dir.h issue, if I manually build qsf-dir.h, the errors
> go away.
Derek reports this (and the src/engine/ issue) does not occur for him
wit
After coordinating with David Hampton last night, he's hopeful to have
the G2 -> HEAD merge done by this coming weekend of Nov 5/6th. As such,
I intend to do the CVS -> SVN repository migration this coming weekend
as well.
Proposal: On Sunday November 6th we will switch from CVS to SVN.
IF Y
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 10:44 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Also, still no charts. I have tried many different charts with different
> dates, account selections etc still says:
> unable to push bar chart
> -- or --
> unable to display pie chart
Hmm. Do you have a libgoffice provided by you
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 14:32 -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've either been involved with, or done personally, a couple of CVS to
> Subversion conversions. Even the large one that affected our entire
> company went really, really smoothly.
As well, a
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 22:50 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Josh, should I have access under the developer URL?
Yes. If you can use cvs, then you should be able to use svn+ssh ...
it's the same mechanism used to invoke both.
> $ svn checkout
> svn+ssh://svn.gnucash.org/repo/gnucash/branches/gnuca
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:21 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> I thought afterwards whether a SVN equivalent to a CVS tag would be required
> to mark the point immediately before a new branch is created. I guess it is
> replaced by the revision number for the actual branch creation?
It is replaced by
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 06:16 -0800, Brian Rose wrote:
> Is Scheme/Guile staying in or going out? Would
> e-guile be deleted within the year
> and replaced?
:) Good question. In my ideal world, we would remove it entirely and
find a different, light-weight templating system for the reports ...
so
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:11 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> At this point in time, all CVS commit access has been locked out
> so David and perform the g2->head collapse. After the collapse
> I expect Josh to perform the CVS->SVN migration. Future commits
> should happen in SVN. Mail will be sent o
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 19:20 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> Assuming that the merge goes smoothly, we're going to take advantage of
> the tree already being closed and just get this over and done with ...
> as such, I'm planning on doing the svn re-migration tonight. It'll
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 02:21 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> Considering the hour and pains experienced, let us consider the
> subversion repository both authoritative and experimental for the next
> 12 hours or so... until tomorrow afternoon (~2pm) at least.
>
> Checkout ... build... e
After the G2->HEAD collapse last night, and after a few migrations last
night and this morning to handle various issues, we're declaring victory
in the CVS -> SVN migration.
The Subversion repository is now authoritative for GnuCash development.
To re-iterate, as the gnome2-branch has been merged
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 12:00 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Yes, we've discussed installing trac, at least for the changeset
> views. We probably wouldn't use the wiki or tracker. So, consider
> it "on the list" for things we want to do when we get the extra
> cycles to work on it.
Oh, it looks lik
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:59 -0500, GnuCash Admin wrote:
> Welcome to cvs.gnucash.org. You now have an account, chris,
> which you can use to access the CVS sources. You can now access
> the sources by:
>
> cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvs/cvsroot ...
Heh. I probably should have update
I've setup Trac at http://svn.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi .
I've pared it down a lot; specifically: the "Timeline", changeset
viewing, source-browsing, searching and basic read-only wiki
functionality are available. The Roadmap, Milestones, Ticketing and
Reporting functionality is all disabled.
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 22:19 +0545, Pawan Chitrakar wrote:
> i was able to make but while running i get the splash screen with
> Nepali text running but i get this last error and gnucash quits
> what could be the solution
> ERROR: Unbound variable: gnc:report-menu-setup
Where did you insta
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 11:58 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> But then I can't have a separate po directory. How can gnucash and cashutil
> be
> packaged separately if they use the same translation files? I also use a
> different manpage system, have vastly reduced numbers of dependencies and
> cur
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:50 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> The files are in now and I'm testing.
>
> I'll commit the ChangeLog only when complete.
I thought you were going to do this on a branch... was I mistaken?
Why didn't you do this as a single commit/changeset?
...jsled
--
http://asynchron
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 16:58 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Probably a bad idea to begin with. If people want to know the changes in
> > Makefile.am, they will use "svn diff Makefile.am".
>
> Well, that's what someone asked for so that's what I tried to do.
Hmm... what was asked for, exactly?
>
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 17:29 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Monday 07 November 2005 5:07 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Who asked for that? I've asked for emailed-in patches to be small..
> > But who ever said that SVN commits should be small? SVN commits
> > should be functionally-complete objects
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 14:11 -0800, Jay Scherrer wrote:
> example: ;
Um, if their schema says...
[...]
then you should be generating...
12345
Using XSLT, that might look like...
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 11:37 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> I've setup Trac at http://svn.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi .
Derek did the work last night to move the URL-space to:
http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/
Leading to pretty resource-locators such as:
- http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/timeline
The gnucash/accounts/C/acctlist_* files are incomplete fragments, exist
only in the default locale, are not translated, and not installed except
in dist, and are apparently not needed for the account hierarchy to
work.
Does anyone have a good reason for them to hang around?
...jsled
--
http://a
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 13:54 +0100, Didier Vidal wrote:
> However, I have a few problems with this architecture:
>- The GUI actions (in this case, open the account hierarchy druid,
> open a new account tree page) are managed by a class in the engine
> module. That's odd to me. engine should be
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 19:00 +0100, Didier Vidal wrote:
> > Hmm. With this patch, the hook is registered at account-tree
> > plugin-page class-initialization time, and the hook applies to all new
> > books, regardless of origin. That doesn't seem quite right on either
> > count...
> >
>
> What's
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 12:34 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> So what's the difference between accounts/C/acctchrt_* and acctlist_* ?
> (and why is only one version being translated?)
The acctlist files seem to contain just the relevent leaf- and
intermediate-level accounts, and are inconsistent ... n
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 22:21 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Objections? Thoughts?
No objection.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
http
For a while, we've been using a "fake" version of goffice, copied into
the gnucash source tree. Before I had said I was basically going to
leave it in place for the next release, but there are plenty of good
reasons to do so.
In any case, there's a bunch of constraints on this problem:
* <=libgs
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 10:53 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> The build continues only as far as:
> go-pattern.c:150:2: #warning This result is actually an xmlChar we could run
> into trouble with g_free vs xmlFree. Can we change the interface?
I'd rather make as few changes to these libraries as pos
Thank you very much for these fixes.
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 15:33 -0500, Neil Williams wrote:
> Modified:
> gnucash/branches/goffice-update/lib/goffice-0.0.4/goffice/cut-n-paste/foocanvas/Makefile.am
> ===
> ---
> gnucash/branches/g
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 09:33 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 November 2005 1:08 am, David Hampton wrote:
> > The argument parsing and usage help output should be correct for 2.0 as
> > shipped.
>
> Don't make me laugh. The CLI argument parsing, usage and help output of the
> entire 1
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 16:52 -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
> Is there a way to get the Trac Wiki pages to create a Table of Contents like
> the gnomesupport.org wiki?
>
> Having the ToC like this page:
> http://gnomesupport.org/wiki/index.php/GnuCashFaq
> looks better than this page:
> http://svn.gnuc
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 11:22 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Actually I'm still unsure whether we really should start maintaining a
> non-trivial wiki on svn.gnucash.org (I hope this question doesn't sound
> blasphemic by now).
>
> Currently we have online documentation about gnucash at the fo
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 11:59 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>b) Spectrum goes:
> 1) no user edits; only moderators edit/add new mods
> 2) same as 1) w/ webform for requesting write-access. (manual approval)
> 3) same as 2) but with CAPTCHA, email callback and automatic approval
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 14:12 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:15:21PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 11:59 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > >b) Spectrum goes:
> > > 1) no user edits; only moderators edit/add new mo
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 15:59 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Also, the focus tends toward the setting of the restriction-level
> since that's viewed as a free-variable, but I want to re-emphasize
> that lowering the cost of the corrective action is *really* important.
> Any wiki should be read-only
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 16:25 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Comments?
This change is fine with me, and sounds good.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-deve
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 15:59 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> As for how to get the list of files changed, you can just run a diff:
>
> svn diff | grep '^Index'
`svn status` works quite nicely for figuring out the file-level status.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.
Thanks to the efforts of Neil and Derek, the goffice-update branch is
pretty robust at this point, except for issues on 64-bit platforms.
However, since I understand those issues already appear on HEAD, I'm
going to merge the branch back in this weekend sometime ... later today
or tomorrow. Shout
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 11:55 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> Thanks to the efforts of Neil and Derek, the goffice-update branch is
> pretty robust at this point, except for issues on 64-bit platforms.
> However, since I understand those issues already appear on HEAD, I'm
> going to merg
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 23:19 -0800, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 11:55 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Thanks to the efforts of Neil and Derek, the goffice-update branch is
> > pretty robust at this point, except for issues on 64-bit platforms.
> > However, sin
I never published my notes about moving the CVS repository to SVN...
The basics are covered in all the applicable documentation, though
there's are some things I distilled out, primarily around cvs2svn.
cvs2svn is seperately available from http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/ but has
not-quite-direct docs
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 09:07 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Coming from CVS, I expected svn to recursively remove the directory in the
> update but it has not. It has cleaned out the files beneath it, leaving just
> the Makefile and Makefile.in apart from here:
> lib/goffice/gui-utils:
> go-marshal
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 13:59 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> What do you find good about it, Josh? Should anyone need to revert they could
> get in the way - or at least they would if svn behaves like cvs in that
> regard, I don't know, haven't tried.
Because the version control system should not c
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:05 -0500, Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
> > I took Karl up on this offer, and David Hampton and I were able to
> > squish the happily-small number of 64-bit compilation issues. If you
> > see others, please speak up.
>
> I've now been able to compile GnuCash on my
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 11:15 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> Ah, hmm. I probably should have built with all options... I'll see
> what I can do later.
Fixed. Thanks for the heads up.
...jsled
--
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAI
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 11:40 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> So I think my counter proposal:
>
> create gnucash-commits
> - duplicate the subscription database from -patches to -commits
> - move the svn log messages w/o diffs from -patches to -commits
>
> suggest people to send "code-to-test"
We're going to continue to see the beginning-of-the-(fiscal)-year bump
in interest in gnucash for the next few weeks. It'd be really nice if
the links from www.gnucash.org were updated to be correct.
Specifically:
- "Wiki/FAQ" to http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/
- "Browse Source" to http://svn.gnu
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 23:32 -0500, David Reiser wrote:
> Click OK in the SX editor dialog (notice, I didn't enter/record the
> change to the transaction)
[deletia]
> If I remember to enter the transaction before trying to close the
> editor dialog, there is no error.
This is reproducible, thou
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 11:15 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> did you read the discussion on
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321405 ?
Nope, I didn't see that at all.
> "Actually the *_full* account sets do make some sense. These (or at
> least of the *full* files) was the original
In the example account hierearchies, it seems that we should encourage
the creation of placeholder accounts for all the non-leaf accounts ...
any objections to my changing the datafiles in this way?
--
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 17:02 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I noticed that lib/libgsf-1.12.3 bombs on `make check'.
>
> Does anyone know if this is an artefact of our copying it into our
> tree or if it just isn't meant to work?
>
> Should we
> a) disable the tests
> b) upgrade libgsf
> c) deb
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:52 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> gog-renderer-cairo.h seems to have escaped the goffice import even though
> gog-renderer-cairo.c is present.
>
> This breaks `make dist'. I can import this file from goffice myself,
> and obviously, `make dist' doesn't really care what I
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:57 -0500, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:40:08PM -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> > (a) or (c) ... (b) isn't really an option, as we need a version that's
> > supported by our targeted distributions.
>
> I thought the point o
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 15:37 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> Reviewing the goffice-0.0.4.tar.bz2 file I used as source for the
> import, *it* doesn't have that file. Huh. I'm tracking it down
> presently.
>
> Come to think of it, I've never enabled cairo on the goffice s
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 12:11 +0100, Martin Klaffenboeck wrote:
> There are some things that doesn't work for me at the moment, but I
> think I can try to make some patches. Should I just poste them here or
> can I have a write account for svn?
Pasting them here (gnucash-devel), with a subject of
"
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 16:46 -0700, Dave Herman wrote:
> gnome2 branch - yes I realize there is still a way to go. As I have
> some time - I've retired - but am no much of a programmer. Too many
> years ago. I'm willing to assist in the testing.
Yes, there is, and thanks for jumping in. :)
> I
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:00 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> The archives are all created by mailman. So it's mailman that's
> putting that into the archive html. I have no idea why or how
> to fix that.
We'll need either httpd.conf or .htaccess rules to set the charset at
the HTTP level ... I was p
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 06:55 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1: I found the fault...(Why my norwegian accounts didn't work) The
> Conglomerate XML editor is cutting away the "gnc-act:" from the xml tags.
> (A bug i think... it does it with all the files it edits). An updated
> norwegian account li
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 16:31 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Okay. The gnomesupport.org maintainer now has given me access again, and
> now every gnucash-related page on that wiki has a HUGE sign indicating
> the currently used wiki. Thanks for pointing this out.
How broad is your access? Any
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 10:50 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > By mod_redirect you are referring to Apache? No, I don't have any
> > access there. I only have ''Admin'' access in the MediaWiki there.
> > And besides, I think the manual "page moved"
We now have HTTP "moved permananently" redirects from the
gnomesupport.org pages to the relevant to wiki.gnucash.org content.
Forwarded Message
> From: Luke Stroven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: gnomesupport
101 - 200 of 624 matches
Mail list logo
