Re: Double initialization of custom (text) views in Gorm files

2008-11-20 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Wolfgang, I've commited a fix for this. Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer From: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wolfgang Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; gnustep

Re: Double initialization of custom (text) views in Gorm files

2008-11-20 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Actually, sorry... from looking at this it seems that you're correct: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CocoaViewsGuide/SubclassingNSView/chapter_6_section_2.html I don't think that anyone is currently relying on that functionality within GNUstep. I might make some of th

Re: Double initialization of custom (text) views in Gorm files

2008-11-20 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Wolfgang, These are what are known as "designated initializers" they are called on objects when a nib is instantiated on instances of custom classes only. This is what is described in Apple's documentation and fits with observed behavior on OpenStep and on Cocoa. If we can find a cleaner imp

Double initialization of custom (text) views in Gorm files

2008-11-20 Thread Wolfgang Lux
The -initWithCoder: method of GSTextViewTemplate in GSNibTemplates invokes the -initWithFrame:textContainer: initializer on self if the custom subclass of NSTextView implements that method. Unfortunately, this leads to a double initialization of instances and, in particular, any customization

Re: GNUstep on 64 bit Windows - Patch for gnustep libobjc submitted

2008-11-20 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
Am 20.11.2008 um 10:18 schrieb Roland Schwingel: Hi Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11.11.2008 19:12:34: > It would be great of you if you could submit those patches also to > the GCC mainline via http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ so that both forks > don't diverge even further. > > Select

Re: GNUstep on 64 bit Windows - Patch for gnustep libobjc submitted

2008-11-20 Thread Roland Schwingel
Hi Lars [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11.11.2008 19:12:34: > It would be great of you if you could submit those patches also to > the GCC mainline via http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ so that both forks > don't diverge even further. > > Select "libobjc" as component in bugzilla (and be prepared fo