On 4 May 2017 at 03:52, T L wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:21:52 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, T L wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 12:46:47 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
but
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:21:52 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, T L
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 12:46:47 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>>>
>>> but
>>> const (
>>> a = iota
>>> b
>>> s string
>>> d
>>> )
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:04 PM, T L wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 12:46:47 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>>
>> but
>> const (
>> a = iota
>> b
>> s string
>> d
>> )
>> is not a valid declaration. You can't say "the rule is the same for
>>
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 12:46:47 AM UTC+8, Axel Wagner wrote:
>
> but
> const (
> a = iota
> b
> s string
> d
> )
> is not a valid declaration. You can't say "the rule is the same for
> constants".
>
For the same rule, I mean just copying the corresponding part from last
but
const (
a = iota
b
s string
d
)
is not a valid declaration. You can't say "the rule is the same for
constants".
Again: const-declarations and variable declarations are very different. You
can not argue "it's the same"; it's not.
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:28 PM, T L
On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 12:17:13 AM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:00 PM T L
> wrote:
>
> > Just like what expected for constants.
>
> For constants it's expected to reuse the last iota expression when absent.
> Do you propose that
>
> var
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 6:00 PM T L wrote:
> Just like what expected for constants.
For constants it's expected to reuse the last iota expression when absent.
Do you propose that
var (
a = iota
b
)
will become valid and
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 11:39:29 PM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:07 PM T L
> wrote:
>
> > The complexity is the same as iota in constant declarations.
>
> How can that be claimed when still nobody ever seen any specification of
> what var foo
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:07 PM T L wrote:
> The complexity is the same as iota in constant declarations.
How can that be claimed when still nobody ever seen any specification of
what var foo = iota shall do at all? The space of possible semantics is
unbounded. The sane
On 05/03/2017 10:38 AM, T L wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 9:28:28 PM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM T L
> wrote:
>
> Why would you want to assign iota to a variable? What value should
> iota in such case have?
>
>
> The request
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 10:53:42 PM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:38 PM T L
> wrote:
>
> > The request is not essential, but any harm of it?
>
> How can anybody know that if nobody knows what it shall actually do and
> what will be the impact on
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:38 PM T L wrote:
> The request is not essential, but any harm of it?
How can anybody know that if nobody knows what it shall actually do and
what will be the impact on the complexity of the specification and
implementation?
--
-j
--
You
On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 9:28:28 PM UTC+8, Jan Mercl wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM T L
> wrote:
>
> Why would you want to assign iota to a variable? What value should iota in
> such case have?
>
>
The request is not essential, but any harm of it?
>
> --
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM T L wrote:
Why would you want to assign iota to a variable? What value should iota in
such case have?
--
-j
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
in Khomoutov <flatw...@users.sourceforge.net>, Dan Kortschak
<dan.kortsc...@adelaide.edu.au>, Marvin Renich <m...@renich.org>, golang-nuts
<golang-nuts@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] why "iota"?
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:43:09 -0800
Michael Jones <mi
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 06:43:09 -0800
Michael Jones wrote:
> “…on our math high school courses.”
>
> Which I imagine are like my college math courses!
Oh, yes, I meant college; silly me ;-)
The problem is that we have somewhat incompatible denominations for
these
ts@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Konstantin Khomoutov <
> flatw...@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thursday, November 10, 2016 at 4:09 AM
> To: Dan Kortschak <dan.kortsc...@adelaide.edu.au>
> Cc: Marvin Renich <m...@renich.org>, golang-nuts <
> golang-nuts@googlegr
<dan.kortsc...@adelaide.edu.au>
Cc: Marvin Renich <m...@renich.org>, golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] why "iota"?
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:27:49 +1030
Dan Kortschak <dan.kortsc...@adelaide.edu.au> wrote:
> On We
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:27:49 +1030
Dan Kortschak wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 09:30 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote:
> > Iota is pronounced eye-OH-tuh.
>
> Or yoh-ta (like Yoda, but with s/d/t/) if not in America.
>
I concur that here in Russia we taught to spell it
If you're looking for Greek pronunciation of Greek letters, there's this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPEtRc05G7Q
which agrees with what I learned in high school (and what is now stuck in
my head).
On Saturday, April 27, 2013 at 8:52:36 PM UTC-4, mb0 wrote:
>
> > Wikipedia says it's a greek
On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 07:02:38 -0800
Michael Jones wrote:
[...]
> According to the OED, the meaning of iota as “a small or
> insignificant quantity” derived from iota being the smallest letter
> in the Greek alphabet (i.e., physical orthography.)
>
> P.S. Yes, this is a
tter in the Greek alphabet
> (i.e., physical orthography.)
>
>
>
> P.S. Yes, this is a little bit more detailed than was necessary…but…many
> of us are working hard to find joy today.
>
>
>
> *From: *<golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> on behalf of <liyu1...@gmail.com>
lang-nuts@googlegroups.com> on behalf of <liyu1...@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 10:04 PM
To: golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] why "iota"?
I don`t know how to speak 'iota' too,I have to say "i---o---t---a" when I talk
with som
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:04 AM, wrote:
> I don`t know how to speak 'iota' too,I have to say "i---o---t---a" when I
> talk with somebody.
>
>
Being a crude Texan, I pronounce it like "eye ough ta"
(which is also how I pronounce "i ought to" because, well, I'm a Texan!
* liyu1...@gmail.com [161109 08:26]:
> I don`t know how to speak 'iota' too,I have to say "i---o---t---a" when I
> talk with somebody.
>
> 在 2013年4月28日星期日 UTC+8上午8:52:36,mb0写道:
> >
> > > Wikipedia says it's a greek alphabet that looks like i, and I am seeing
> > > APL used
I don`t know how to speak 'iota' too,I have to say "i---o---t---a" when I
talk with somebody.
在 2013年4月28日星期日 UTC+8上午8:52:36,mb0写道:
>
> > Wikipedia says it's a greek alphabet that looks like i, and I am seeing
> > APL used iota for something like range() in python, which makes
> > go-lang's
26 matches
Mail list logo