Oh interesting. Maybe I'm mis-understanding google's intention here. I had
hoped to use app-engine to host a generic web-facing site. It seems like a
brilliant platform for that. But perhaps this is not a primary use case
considered by google? Or maybe that's what they mean by "users outside your
o
Hey David,
You can use App Engine for building a generic internet facing site.
App Engine for Business seems to be targeting a different market
segment, businesses running intranet type apps.
Robert
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 15:34, David Parks wrote:
> Oh interesting. Maybe I'm mis-unders
i think if any user use use ir u get $8 for that but in month max is $1000
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Robert Kluin wrote:
> Hey David,
> You can use App Engine for building a generic internet facing site.
> App Engine for Business seems to be targeting a different market
> segment, busine
The pricing is meant to be extremely competitive against "private cloud"
offerings by other providers in this space. A $40-$100 VPS does not come
with baked-in authentication with Google Apps or a centralized
administration, nor does it come with App Engine's APIs. You can certainly
build a similar
ooglegroups.com
[mailto:google-appeng...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ikai Lan (Google)
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 12:48 AM
To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google apps engine for Business pricing
Q
The pricing is meant to be extremely competitive a
egroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Ikai Lan (Google)
> *Sent:* Friday, October 22, 2010 12:48 AM
> *To:* google-appengine@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google apps engine for Business
> pricing Q
>
>
>
> The pricing is meant to be extremely competitive aga
