[gcj] Question About Submition

2010-03-03 Thread MikeN
It's the first time i'll participate in CJ. I want to know : 1. How many problem each round has ? 2. Is there any extra form to submit source code and output, or what's the order ? (Zip file ?) 3. Do we have to solve both small and large file ? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message b

Re: [gcj] Question About Submition

2010-03-03 Thread Bharath Raghavendran
1. first few rounds are 3 qns per round. it increases later .. you can check the questions of previous year's contests for this 2. while reading the questions, if you are logged in, you will have an option above where you can download the input file. once you do that, you get option to send the ou

Re: [gcj] Question About Submition

2010-03-03 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
> > if you dont solve a single large, you probably wont make it to > next round though. I was going to disagree, but it turns out the only round last year where it was possible to make it to the next round with only Smalls was 1A, so you're quite right. i dont see a reason why anyone would submi

Re: [gcj] Question About Submition

2010-03-03 Thread Bharath Raghavendran
Actually I have noticed that people do a last-minute submission for large even though they haven't solved small. Making this change will not allow that to happen any more. eg., 2 participants in http://code.google.com/codejam/contest/scoreboard?c=32016#vt=1&sp=441 Maybe just an additional dialog b

Re: [gcj] Question About Submition

2010-03-04 Thread saurabh gupta
i agree with Bharath. On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Bharath Raghavendran wrote: > Actually I have noticed that people do a last-minute submission for > large even though they haven't solved small. Making this change will > not allow that to happen any more. eg., 2 participants in > http://code

Re: [gcj] Question About Submition

2010-03-05 Thread Bartholomew Furrow
> > Maybe just an additional dialog box asking "You haven't submitted solution for small. Are you sure you want to submit for large? You > won't be able to sibmit again blah blah blah" will suffice. Just my > opinion. > That's a good idea, and one of the options we considered. Ultimately we didn