[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

Hi John, Thats fine your debating how best to do it for the longer term, and thats great for the longer term. How about now today? how best can I do it now? For the shorter term I am sure there is a bunch of people who look at this and think, I've got GWT and Google App Engine, I want to put the

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > I hope I am not being naive (or reiterating an existing post), but I > am not concerned with identity, nor concerned with expecting my ORM > solution to deal with entities created on the client. > If you don't preserve identity, I don't see

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > > I hope I am not being naive (or reiterating an existing post), but I > am not concerned with identity, nor concerned with expecting my ORM > solution to deal with entities created on the client. > > I think all I need is a way to use an en

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

[Continued - Mail got away from me] ...Besides fixing GWT-RPC with GAE, it also allows me to trim data that I don't really need on the client side. The rest, like knowing when to persist vs merge an incoming object from the client, is my problem to figure out. Rob On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:3

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

I hope I am not being naive (or reiterating an existing post), but I am not concerned with identity, nor concerned with expecting my ORM solution to deal with entities created on the client. I think all I need is a way to use an entity as a DTO without needing a second set of model objects. What

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5237 - Tweaks docs on secure cookies, fixing issue 1638

Author: rj...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 17:01:10 2009 New Revision: 5237 Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/Cookies.java Log: Tweaks docs on secure cookies, fixing issue 1638 tbr: jgw Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/Cookies.java =

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5234 - Creates snapshot-2009.04.14 from tr...@5230 via svn copy -r 5230 https://google-web-toolk...

Author: amitman...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 15:59:28 2009 New Revision: 5234 Added: branches/snapshot-2009.04.14/ - copied from r5230, /trunk/ Log: Creates snapshot-2009.04.14 from tr...@5230 via svn copy -r 5230 https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk https://googl

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5236 - added a branch-info.txt

Author: amitman...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 16:22:20 2009 New Revision: 5236 Added: branches/snapshot-2009.04.14-r5230/branch-info.txt Log: added a branch-info.txt Added: branches/snapshot-2009.04.14-r5230/branch-info.txt ==

[gwt-contrib] "code" review

Joel, a javadoc tweak for your TBR: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5237 rjrjr --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5235 - Includes the revision number

Author: amitman...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 16:17:25 2009 New Revision: 5235 Added: branches/snapshot-2009.04.14-r5230/ - copied from r5234, /branches/snapshot-2009.04.14/ Removed: branches/snapshot-2009.04.14/ Log: Includes the revision number --~--~-~--~~---

[gwt-contrib] DOMImpl.scrollIntoView() scrolls to the right edge instead of left edge

Reviewers: jgw, Description: If an element does not fit in its parent element, DOMImpl.scrollIntoView(elem) will line up the right edge of the elem with the right edge of the parent, which looks ugly. The desired behavior is for the elem to scroll into view and have its left edge align with its

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5233 - Edited wiki page through web user interface.

Author: amitman...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 15:15:57 2009 New Revision: 5233 Modified: wiki/ResourceOracle.wiki Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface. Modified: wiki/ResourceOracle.wiki == --- wiki/Res

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5232 - Changed the "async modules" pattern to be called "async provider"

Author: sp...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 14:05:42 2009 New Revision: 5232 Modified: wiki/CodeSplitting.wiki Log: Changed the "async modules" pattern to be called "async provider" Modified: wiki/CodeSplitting.wiki =

[gwt-contrib] Re: UiBinder

On Apr 14, 12:59 pm, Bruce Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Chris wrote: > > No promises, but it's worth noting that trunk is quite stable these days. > Teams within Google are using the trunk all the time, so we have an > incentive to keep it stable on average. > > -- Bruce

[gwt-contrib] Re: Clearing up the Issue Tracker

http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/list?can=2&q=-Milestone:1_6_RC&colspec=ID+Type+Status+Priority+Milestone+Owner+Summary&cells=tiles That should help. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Luminari wrote: > > I just wanted to make a request to clear up the Issue Tracker.  It's > s

[gwt-contrib] Clearing up the Issue Tracker

I just wanted to make a request to clear up the Issue Tracker. It's still littered with 1.6RC issues, which makes it harder to see what's open. Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add -soyc flag to Compiler

On 2009/04/14 18:39:37, jgw wrote: > scottb: > > That implies you'd want to remove it from GWTCompiler, right? > I haven't really looked into this much -- I just needed it to work for my own > soyc efforts. It appears from looking at the code that Compiler and Precompile > are entirely separate e

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add -soyc flag to Compiler

On 2009/04/14 18:24:37, spoon wrote: > This is a good change overall. Compiler should accept -soyc. scottb: > That implies you'd want to remove it from GWTCompiler, right? I haven't really looked into this much -- I just needed it to work for my own soyc efforts. It appears from looking at the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add -soyc flag to Compiler

This is a good change overall. Compiler should accept -soyc. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/22802 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add -soyc flag to Compiler

Scott: I'm not sure I agree... shouldn't that arg handler get setup in Precompile.ArgProcessor? Me: Ok. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/22802 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:03 AM, John Tamplin wrote: > > The only way I see it working would be to add a flag requiring preserving > > object identity across RPC, and the protocol would include an object ID > with > > each object if that fla

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Toby Reyelts wrote: > > I think this is a false dichotomy. JDO has fetch-groups for just that > kind > > of scenario. You send down a slice of an object graph that meets exactly > > your needs. You don't h

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Toby Reyelts wrote: > I think this is a false dichotomy. JDO has fetch-groups for just that kind > of scenario. You send down a slice of an object graph that meets exactly > your needs. You don't have to re-invent an entire DTO layer just to send a > subset of yo

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:03 AM, John Tamplin wrote: > GWT RPC does not preserve identity across the wire, and the GWT compiler > needs the source of the classes at compile time. > > The only way I see it working would be to add a flag requiring preserving > object identity across RPC, and the p

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:03 PM, John Tamplin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:26 AM, philip wrote: > >> So I like GWT and I like Google App Engine, all I want is a simple >> recipe for getting the two to work without hitting too many big >> problems. >> I'm willing to use DTO, I'm willing t

[gwt-contrib] Re: UiBinder

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Chris wrote: > > As you get organized for the next release(s), It would be nice to have > more frequent releases with one or two major features. There are some > major enhancements sitting in trunk (RunAsync is the one I'm really > looking forward too). I reali

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5231 - Merging tr...@5229:5230 into 2009-03-30 release branch.

Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 09:10:36 2009 New Revision: 5231 Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.03.30-r5111/branch-info.txt branches/snapshot-2009.03.30-r5111/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java branches/snapshot-2009.03.30-r5111/user/src/com/goog

[gwt-contrib] Re: UiBinder

As you get organized for the next release(s), It would be nice to have more frequent releases with one or two major features. There are some major enhancements sitting in trunk (RunAsync is the one I'm really looking forward too). I realize this might not be possible with this type of project an

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:26 AM, philip wrote: > So I like GWT and I like Google App Engine, all I want is a simple > recipe for getting the two to work without hitting too many big > problems. > I'm willing to use DTO, I'm willing to suffer whatever I have to do - > but I need to know what's th

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5230 - FF3 uses negative scrollLeft positions in RTL, but FF2 does not. This patch checks for t...

Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 08:40:48 2009 New Revision: 5230 Modified: trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozilla.java trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplMozillaOld.java trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/DOMImplSafari.java trunk/us

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT-RPC broken in GAE/J

Hi, So I like GWT and I like Google App Engine, all I want is a simple recipe for getting the two to work without hitting too many big problems. I'm willing to use DTO, I'm willing to suffer whatever I have to do - but I need to know what's the best current way to do it. Thanks, Philip On Apr

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT File Upload issue

I fail to see how this resolves arun's "bug" with GWT form panel -jason On Apr 14, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Dug wrote: > > Hi arun > > U can use GwtSwfExt lib for uploading files(gmail style file upload). > This lib is wrapper on SWFUpload . > http://code.google.com/p/gwtswfext/ > > Thanks > Dug > > O

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r5229 - Revert r5226; dependency on seed functions interacts poorly with runAsync.

Author: b...@google.com Date: Tue Apr 14 07:19:33 2009 New Revision: 5229 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JClassLiteral.java trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JProgram.java trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GenerateJavaAST.java trun

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR : Chunk the JavaScript in the initial fragment

It still sounds to me like the route Scott suggested and Bob agreed with would be better, so as to avoid the whole issue of re-lexing the JS during link. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Vitali Lovich wrote: > Should've mentioned this in the original post, but probably the > TokenStream.java

[gwt-contrib] Re: UiBinder

No update yet, unfortunately. We have to get ourselves organized again now that GWT 1.6 is out the door, and then we'll have a better idea of when it will be available. On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Gary Miller wrote: > > Any news on when UiBinder will be available to the outside world? > > T

[gwt-contrib] Re: ImmutableResourceBundle deprecated, move to ClientBundle

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:02 AM, dflorey wrote: > Good news! Are there plans to consolidate ClientBundle and i18n > messages & constants? > It would be very nice to have a single bundle for all resources of a > widget to streamline the widget cusomization. As an interim step, look at GwtCreateRe

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT File Upload issue

Hi arun U can use GwtSwfExt lib for uploading files(gmail style file upload). This lib is wrapper on SWFUpload . http://code.google.com/p/gwtswfext/ Thanks Dug On Apr 9, 12:58 am, "arun.r...@gmail.com" wrote: > Hi All, > > I am getting multipart false on server side even i am setting it > (ENC

[gwt-contrib] Re: ImmutableResourceBundle deprecated, move to ClientBundle

Good news! Are there plans to consolidate ClientBundle and i18n messages & constants? It would be very nice to have a single bundle for all resources of a widget to streamline the widget cusomization. On 14 Apr., 01:55, BobV wrote: > I've deprecated the public ImmutableResourceBundle interfaces