[GRASS-user] r.le or r.li course material

2014-08-23 Thread Milton Ribeiro
Dear all, anyone know a course material for r.le and/or r.li landscape course in grass? -- Miltinho - m...@rc.unesp.br Laboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação - LEEC Depto de Ecologia - UNESP - Rio Claro Av. 24A, 1515- Bela Vista 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brasil Fone: +55 19 3526-9647 (of

Re: [GRASS-user] r.le or r.li?

2010-03-28 Thread Hamish
Markus: > The differences: r.le is the first implementation but > unmaintained. fwiw, as far as what "unmaintained" means, we'll (or I'll) try and fix obvious functionality bugs if people point them out, but the original authors have moved on to new challenges and no one has volunteered to formall

Re: [GRASS-user] r.le or r.li?

2010-03-28 Thread maning sambale
> That's right. > The differences: r.le is the first implementation but unmaintained. > r.li is a new implementation and somewhat maintained (just fixed > a bug today). Hopefully more indices are added in future. Thanks for clarifying. So r.li it is. >> Follow up inquiry, how do I include the the

Re: [GRASS-user] r.le or r.li?

2010-03-26 Thread Markus Neteler
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 3:39 AM, maning sambale wrote: > Hi, > > I'm doing some patch stats analysis (largest patch, edge and interior > patches). There are meta modules available in grass r.le and r.li. > The seem to provide similar set of patch statistics calculations. I > want to know the ba

[GRASS-user] r.le or r.li?

2010-03-14 Thread maning sambale
Hi, I'm doing some patch stats analysis (largest patch, edge and interior patches). There are meta modules available in grass r.le and r.li. The seem to provide similar set of patch statistics calculations. I want to know the basic difference of the two. r.li seems to be very similar to fragst