Hello,
"Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, perhaps it would be nicer to put both those notes in a top
> level file called "ChangeLog", rather than in HACKING.
Yes, that's the most obvious place to put information about ChangeLogs.
Other ChangeLogs can be renamed as you suggeste
2008/8/30 Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>
>>> Then I guess I'm happy to abolish ChangeLogs. Two questions remain:
>>>
>>> 1. Should we remove ChangeLog files from the repo?
>>> 2. Should we generate ChangeLogs
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> Then I guess I'm happy to abolish ChangeLogs. Two questions remain:
>>
>> 1. Should we remove ChangeLog files from the repo?
>> 2. Should we generate ChangeLogs for releases?
>>
>> I'd say "yes" to (1) and "no" to
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hey!
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>
>>> That said, the ideal would be something like `add-change-log-entry' that
>>> operates on Git logs instead of ChangeLogs, but there doesn't seem to be
>>> anything like this. DV
Hey!
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
>> That said, the ideal would be something like `add-change-log-entry' that
>> operates on Git logs instead of ChangeLogs, but there doesn't seem to be
>> anything like this. DVC is said to support things like that, b
Hi,
On Fri 29 Aug 2008 12:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> That said, the ideal would be something like `add-change-log-entry' that
> operates on Git logs instead of ChangeLogs, but there doesn't seem to be
> anything like this. DVC is said to support things like that, but it
>
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Sergey Poznyakoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
>>
>>> Guile is distributed as a tarball, not a git repo. Does it make sense to
>>> create the ChangeLog from the git log at make dist time?
>>>
>> FWIW, there is a gnulib modul
Hi,
Sergey Poznyakoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
>
>> Guile is distributed as a tarball, not a git repo. Does it make sense to
>> create the ChangeLog from the git log at make dist time?
>>
>
> FWIW, there is a gnulib module for that purpose: gitlog-to-changel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha escrit:
> Guile is distributed as a tarball, not a git repo. Does it make sense to
> create the ChangeLog from the git log at make dist time?
>
FWIW, there is a gnulib module for that purpose: gitlog-to-changelog.
Once you import it to the project, the following Makefile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>> * Much more detailed and inherently correct information can be gotten from
>>
>> git log -- libguile/
>>
>> git log -- test-suite/
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> * The ChangeLog duplicates the git log information if done correctly. Hence
>> it requires double work for the
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reasons:
>
> * Much more detailed and inherently correct information can be gotten from
>
> git log -- libguile/
>
> git log -- test-suite/
>
> etc.
>
> * The ChangeLog duplicates the git log information if done correctly. Hence
> it
Reasons:
* Much more detailed and inherently correct information can be gotten from
git log -- libguile/
git log -- test-suite/
etc.
* The ChangeLog duplicates the git log information if done correctly. Hence
it requires double work for the committer.
* Since updates to the ChangeLog
12 matches
Mail list logo
