Re: branch core-updates updated (49c2a46 -> 568004c)

2017-03-14 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:49:00PM -0400, Efraim Flashner wrote: > efraim pushed a change to branch core-updates > in repository guix. > > from 49c2a46 gnu: python@2.7: Update to 2.7.13 >new c5e9101 gnu: mesa: Use llvm backend for Intel hardware only. >new 2a8b89c gn

Re: 02/05: gnu: nss, nss-certs: Update to 3.29.3.

2017-03-14 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:39:48PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Going forward, I wonder if there could be any unintended side effects by >> simply increasing the timeouts in nss/gtests/ssl_gtest/tls_connect.cc >> from 5000 ms to something like 2. If a 0-day is discover

Re: 02/05: gnu: nss, nss-certs: Update to 3.29.3.

2017-03-14 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:39:48PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > Going forward, I wonder if there could be any unintended side effects by > simply increasing the timeouts in nss/gtests/ssl_gtest/tls_connect.cc > from 5000 ms to something like 2. If a 0-day is discovered in "nss", > we don't want

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc. (version 2)

2017-03-14 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi, >+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary") >+ "fpc-bin.tar") >+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar") Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be untarred immediately from where it is? If it is useful, maybe add

Re: 02/05: gnu: nss, nss-certs: Update to 3.29.3.

2017-03-14 Thread Marius Bakke
Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:02:12PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> This is not really sustainable. A single build attempt takes 7 hours on >> armhf, and about 40 hours on mips. When the failure occurs, it causes >> hundreds of other dependency failures, which must be resta

Re: 02/05: gnu: nss, nss-certs: Update to 3.29.3.

2017-03-14 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:02:12PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > This is not really sustainable. A single build attempt takes 7 hours on > armhf, and about 40 hours on mips. When the failure occurs, it causes > hundreds of other dependency failures, which must be restarted manually, > one at a ti

Re: 02/05: gnu: nss, nss-certs: Update to 3.29.3.

2017-03-14 Thread Mark H Weaver
Marius Bakke writes: > I have built this without trouble on two different x86_64 systems. The > release notes[0] lists a single entry[1] which looks innocuous[2], so I > doubt the failure is related to the upgrade. > > I can't find the build log of the first run, When restarting builds on Hydra,

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

2017-03-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Andy Wingo skribis: > On Tue 14 Mar 2017 14:42, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> If we remove /var/guix/profiles, users will have to actually type >> /gnu/store/asasdfadfgsadfa-profile/bin/guile. This is not great, but I >> don’t know what else could be done. We could profile a

Re: delete profile

2017-03-14 Thread Federico Beffa
Alex Kost writes: > Federico Beffa (2017-03-14 09:42 +0100) wrote: > >> Pjotr Prins writes: >> 'guix -p $HOME/guix-test-profile' lists only 1 generation (but I did >> create another one and then I rolled-back). >> >> I run 'guix gc' and now I find dangling symlinks in my $HOME. > > What dangling

Re: Question related to outputs

2017-03-14 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:14:02PM +, Pjotr Prins wrote: > In a package I have targets for out and debug. Now I want to tell the > make file to build different targets > > make -f Makefile.guix build-with-checks > > make -f Makefile.guix build-without-checks > > The latter would be the d

Re: delete profile

2017-03-14 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:28:52PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > No, "$HOME/guix-test-profile" was not a symlink to > "/var/guix/profiles/...". Try this: Hmmm. You are right. ~/.guix-profile, meanwile, does point inside /var/guix. I have wondered before how GC works on profiles not in /var/guix. W

Question related to outputs

2017-03-14 Thread Pjotr Prins
In a package I have targets for out and debug. Now I want to tell the make file to build different targets make -f Makefile.guix build-with-checks make -f Makefile.guix build-without-checks The latter would be the debug with built in bounds checking etc. After an hour of searching I don't f

Re: Input needed: Plan for packaging scala

2017-03-14 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Katherine, >> It seems you already did the hard work of finding out how to bootstrap >> Scala. (I think that writing the package definitions is the easy >> part. Finding the Scala versions that can be compiled by Java and then >> compile the correct newer Scala version using it is the hard par

Re: delete profile

2017-03-14 Thread Alex Kost
Federico Beffa (2017-03-14 09:42 +0100) wrote: > Pjotr Prins writes: > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:35:56PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >>> Federico Beffa (2017-03-12 18:28 +0100) wrote: >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I've created a profile for test purposes with >>> > >>> > guix package -p $HOME/guix-t

Re: delete profile

2017-03-14 Thread Alex Kost
Pjotr Prins (2017-03-14 05:55 +) wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:35:56PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> Federico Beffa (2017-03-12 18:28 +0100) wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I've created a profile for test purposes with >> > >> > guix package -p $HOME/guix-test-profile -m test-manifest.scm >> >

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

2017-03-14 Thread Andy Wingo
Hey :) On Tue 14 Mar 2017 14:42, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > If we remove /var/guix/profiles, users will have to actually type > /gnu/store/asasdfadfgsadfa-profile/bin/guile. This is not great, but I > don’t know what else could be done. We could profile a > /bin/guile → /gnu/store

Re: [Whonix-devel] GNU Guix Questions

2017-03-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! ban...@openmailbox.org skribis: > Yes we are interested in running our own substitute servers. We > currently host our project specific .deb repo. Or do you mean a full > mirror of hydra? >From a security viewpoint, the more independent builders there are, the better. So if Whonix and ot

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

2017-03-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Andy Wingo skribis: > Yes, though I hadn't thought everything out. I guess my mail question > is about user experience -- this is going to be a gateway for people to > get Guix and Guile and we should make sure there are no rough edges. I > guess in particular I have a concern about users

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Next 10 ocaml packages

2017-03-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 09:28:58PM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote: >> Julien Lepiller (10): >> gnu: Add ocaml-sexplib. >> gnu: Add ocaml-typerep. >> gnu: Add ocaml-variantslib. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv. >> gnu: Add ocaml-ppx-variants-conv. >> gnu: Add ocam

Re: delete profile

2017-03-14 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Federico Beffa skribis: > I've created a profile for test purposes with > > guix package -p $HOME/guix-test-profile -m test-manifest.scm > > that now I would like to delete. I've looked up the documentation but > not found any suitable command. What's the recommended procedure to > delete

Re: 02/05: gnu: nss, nss-certs: Update to 3.29.3.

2017-03-14 Thread Marius Bakke
Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Marius, > > mba...@fastmail.com (Marius Bakke) writes: >> mbakke pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit 4f3dcdd99ba13ab3bdbf1e014afcd076cd95fac7 >> Author: Marius Bakke >> Date: Mon Mar 13 16:53:27 2017 +0100 >> >> gnu: nss, nss-cert

Re: org.gtk.Settings.FileChooser bomb out fix (aka GNOME Settings Schemas)

2017-03-14 Thread Pjotr Prins
Here is another for icecat: (icecat:9674): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not find the icon 'gtk-go-back-ltr'. The 'hicolor' theme was not found either, perhaps you need to install it. I guess it ought to go into debbugs. -

Re: delete profile

2017-03-14 Thread Federico Beffa
Pjotr Prins writes: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:35:56PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: >> Federico Beffa (2017-03-12 18:28 +0100) wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I've created a profile for test purposes with >> > >> > guix package -p $HOME/guix-test-profile -m test-manifest.scm >> > >> > that now I would