dvtm is a good alternative too, and feels a little more natural for
vim users (the default key binding creates a clash with ^g though).
Michael
On 24 August 2011 21:22, Anton Piatek wrote:
> I quite like tmux as an alternative to screen, it has better layout control
> than screen.
>
> Anton
> -
I quite like tmux as an alternative to screen, it has better layout control
than screen.
Anton
-
Anton Piatek
(sent from my phone, please excuse any typos)
email: an...@piatek.co.uk
blog/photos: http://www.strangeparty.com
pgp: [74B1FA37] (http:// www.strangeparty.com/anton.asc)
No trees were des
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:08:21AM +0530, pavithran wrote:
> One cool thing which screen allows is to log on irc forever !
Also one of the worst things it allows us to log on irc forever !
Cheers,
Andy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
One of the great things about screen is you can set it up as the remote command
for when you SSH into a box, so you always continue where you left off (very
useful if you're connecting from your phone or from anywhere over a
3G/EDGE/GPRS/packet radio/... network). Also you can set up a configura
:-D
Tony Wood
(from Linux Netbook)
On 24/08/11 16:06, Freaky Clown wrote:
apparently some people use a "mouse" to click stuff... it will never catch on!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Tony Wood wrote:
OK, I'll buy it: what's>clickety
On 24 August 2011 19:15, Victor Churchill wrote:
> That and, subsequently, screen.
Screen is something which I heard like 3 years back but never tried it
, now I absolutely love , can't live without GNU Screen !
One cool thing which screen allows is to log on irc forever !
Regards,
Pavithran
apparently some people use a "mouse" to click stuff... it will never catch on!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Tony Wood wrote:
>
> OK, I'll buy it: what's >clickety< all about please?
>
> Tony Wood
> (from Linux Netbook)
>
> On 24/08/11 15:02, Vic wrote:
>>>
>>> One of the great (and sometime
OK, I'll buy it: what's >clickety< all about please?
Tony Wood
(from Linux Netbook)
On 24/08/11 15:02, Vic wrote:
One of the great (and sometimes surprising
and sometimes even annoying) things about this technology is it keeps on
coming up with new tool and ways to do stuff.
I'm usually cau
> One of the great (and sometimes surprising
> and sometimes even annoying) things about this technology is it keeps on
> coming up with new tool and ways to do stuff.
I'm usually caught out mid-way through a rant about how $tool would be
excellent if only it did $thing.
"What, like this >clicke
On 24 August 2011 11:29, Rob Malpass wrote:
>
> Lovely - that's exactly what I need - many thanks. Incredible - I've been
> using Unix for nearly 20 years and I've never heard of that command.
>
You are not alone there Rob. I thought exactly the same after I first
encountered the watch comman
> -Original Message-
> From: hampshire-boun...@mailman.lug.org.uk [mailto:hampshire-
> boun...@mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Simon Huggins
> Sent: 23 August 2011 12:24
> To: hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Hampshire] ls -l
>
> On Tue, Aug 23,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:22:17PM +0100, Rob Malpass wrote:
> Is there a way to have ls -l update in real time?
You could just run:
watch ls -l
(as long as the output isn't bigger than your terminal that would
probably do what you want)
--
Simon [ hug...@earth.li ] *\ "Engage
Hi all
I may be missing the obvious here but is there a way to have ls -l wait to
see if more files are added to a directory?
What I'm trying to do is restore from a tape backup and (for reasons I won't
bore you all with) I want to see the output in a terminal as opposed to a
file manager.
13 matches
Mail list logo
