Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:28:21PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
>
> On Fre 13.11.2009 22:50, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> >Hello Willy,
> >sorry, I didn't have time to work on the patch as I wanted.
> >
> >Le jeudi 5 novembre 2009 06:19:41, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> >>> Sorry but I can'
2009/11/15 Wout Mertens :
> I was wondering if HAProxy helps in the following situation:
>
> - We have a wiki site which is quite slow
> - Regular users don't have many problems
> - We also get crawled by a search bot, which creates many concurrent
> connections, more than the hardware can handle
Hi Cyril,
On Fre 13.11.2009 22:50, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hello Willy,
sorry, I didn't have time to work on the patch as I wanted.
Le jeudi 5 novembre 2009 06:19:41, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> Sorry but I can't see in the haproxy sources how the cookie prefix can be
used for appsession.
> "capture
On Son 15.11.2009 15:57, Wout Mertens wrote:
Hi there,
I was wondering if HAProxy helps in the following situation:
- We have a wiki site which is quite slow
- Regular users don't have many problems
- We also get crawled by a search bot, which creates many concurrent
connections, more than the
I would probably do that sort of throttling at the OS level with iptables,
etc...
That said, before that I would investigate why the wiki is so slow...
Something probably isn't configured right if it chokes with only a few
simultaneous accesses. I mean, unless it's embedded server with under 32MB
Hi there,
I was wondering if HAProxy helps in the following situation:
- We have a wiki site which is quite slow
- Regular users don't have many problems
- We also get crawled by a search bot, which creates many concurrent
connections, more than the hardware can handle
- Therefore, service is de
6 matches
Mail list logo
