Hi all,
I've started a patch to enable busy poll support for listener sockets.
It can be enabled by adding "busy-poll" in the bind line. For systems
that don't define SO_BUSY_POLL, building with the USE flag USE_BPS is
required.
I built & tested this on a ubuntu trusty machine (3.13.0 kernel) and
Hi Daniel ,
Yup, I have used the init.haproxy but it doesn't include
$ROOT/sbin/init.d/default. Anyway, I switched to haproxy.init and it's
ok now. Thank you so much.
Best Regards,
2014-08-28 22:34 GMT+07:00 Daniel Dubovik :
> Hey there!
>
> There are three different init scripts in the examples
Hi all,
Le 15/08/2014 12:35, Simon Horman a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 09:12:56AM +0100, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
I agree as well.. :-).
Our original specification was to match the way that ldirectord does its
external health checks (so that the customer scripts are compatible).
We could j
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> Am 28.08.2014 um 23:21 schrieb Baptiste :
>
> Ok,
> I would create a monitoring backend, such as below:
>
>
>
> Hey, thanks a lot!
>
> I will try this and report back.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Rainer
Thanks for reporting.
Also, your minco
Am 28.08.2014 um 23:21 schrieb Baptiste :
> Ok,
> I would create a monitoring backend, such as below:
Hey, thanks a lot!
I will try this and report back.
Best Regards,
Rainer
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> Am 28.08.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Baptiste :
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> maybe you could share your HAProxy configuration :)
>> By default, HAProxy tests a service every 3s, which is fine. It just
>> does a tcp connect, so nothing complicated for you
Am 28.08.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Baptiste :
>
>
> Hi,
>
> maybe you could share your HAProxy configuration :)
> By default, HAProxy tests a service every 3s, which is fine. It just
> does a tcp connect, so nothing complicated for your server to handle.
>
Since we switched to haproxy-1.5, I cha
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> we will put haproxy in front of a Zimbra infrastructure (which we have
> split-up, so that there is a "front end", with pop, imap, smtp and a "back
> end", where the mail sits).
>
> I have too haproxy-servers (active/standby via
Hi,
we will put haproxy in front of a Zimbra infrastructure (which we have
split-up, so that there is a „front end“, with pop, imap, smtp and a „back
end“, where the mail sits).
I have too haproxy-servers (active/standby via CARP) that are checking the
front-ends.
I check:
- smtp
- smtps
-
OK, thanks for the pointers Willy.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:03:54PM -0700, Ben Burkert wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The 3.11 release of the Linux kernel added a new feature for low
>> latency network polling. Using the SO_BUSY_POLL s
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 28, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi Jarno,
>
>
> > I'm testing ssl offloading with nbproc> 1, and I'm having a
> > (random?) problems with chrome. (This is could related to
> > chrome 408 errors
> > (http://blog.haproxy.com/2014/05/26/haproxy-and-http-errors-408-in-chrome/)).
>
>
> No
Hey there!
There are three different init scripts in the examples directory.
init.haproxy seems to be the one that you used, which has the include for
$ROOT/sbin/init.d/default.
haproxy.init is the one that is for a CentOS system.
Thanks!
Dan Dubovik
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
480-505-8800 x
Hi Jarno,
> I'm testing ssl offloading with nbproc> 1, and I'm having a
> (random?) problems with chrome. (This is could related to
> chrome 408 errors
> (http://blog.haproxy.com/2014/05/26/haproxy-and-http-errors-408-in-chrome/)).
Note that the 408 bug should be fixed in Chrome 37, which was r
If you're having trouble viewing this email, please click here.
With our comprehensive health insurance
Hi,
I'm testing ssl offloading with nbproc > 1, and I'm having a
(random?) problems with chrome. (This is could related to
chrome 408 errors
(http://blog.haproxy.com/2014/05/26/haproxy-and-http-errors-408-in-chrome/)).
So far I haven't seen similar problems with IE, Firefox or safari.
At first I
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 07:25:07AM -0500, Ryan Brock wrote:
> I can do it. I should learn the process for submitting changes anyway. I'll
> base it on 1.6.
>
> Thanks for the help. Really appreciate it.
Thanks Ryan. There's nothing fundamental in the way to submit changes. If
you want to ensure t
I can do it. I should learn the process for submitting changes anyway. I'll
base it on 1.6.
Thanks for the help. Really appreciate it.
- Ryan
On Aug 28, 2014 7:18 AM, "Lukas Tribus" wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
>
>
> > I think that experimenting with (txn->status < 200 && txn->status != 101)
> > everyw
Hi Willy,
> I think that experimenting with (txn->status < 200 && txn->status != 101)
> everywhere we currently have a test for < 200 should be a good start. I'd
> rather do this in 1.6-dev first and observe for some time before backporting
> to 1.5, and why not, 1.4.
Understood.
Ryan, would
Great, It works like a charm. Thank you so much :D
Best Regards,
2014-08-28 16:41 GMT+07:00 Baptiste :
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Viet Nguyen Chan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to use HAProxy 1.5.3 with the technique in article
>> http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/07/03/http-request-flo
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:03:54PM -0700, Ben Burkert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The 3.11 release of the Linux kernel added a new feature for low
> latency network polling. Using the SO_BUSY_POLL socket option, an
> application can enable busy polling. This instructs the kernel to poll
> the net
Hi guys,
I'm very sorry for the late response, just trying to catch up with the
long mail queue as I'm having less time these days.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 06:39:22PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
>
> > I apologize, but I am not sure the usual procedure regarding changes.
> > What i
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Viet Nguyen Chan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to use HAProxy 1.5.3 with the technique in article
> http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/07/03/http-request-flood-mitigation/ for
> mitigating HTTP flood, this is (a part of) my config :
>
> frontend ft_waf
> ...
> stick-t
Hi all,
I'm trying to use HAProxy 1.5.3 with the technique in article
http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/07/03/http-request-flood-mitigation/ for
mitigating HTTP flood, this is (a part of) my config :
frontend ft_waf
...
stick-table type ip size 1m expire 10s store gpc0,http_req_rate(10s)
tcp-request c
23 matches
Mail list logo