Hi Holger,
Many thanks for this hint. I guess I will need to follow up with
Openshift/RedHat.
I have posted a question in the forum there, but so far no feedback:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44134775/how-to-suppress-http-connection-keep-alive-header-in-response.
Thanks also for the a
Hi Lukas,
On 22 Jun 2017 3:02 am, "Lukas Tribus" wrote:
Hello,
> Daniel, if using ssl to the backends shouldn't you use http mode?
> Per your config you are using tcp which is default one. Afaik tcp
> is for ssl passthrough.
For the record, this is not true. Just because you need TCP mode
for
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 08:05:20AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > Hi Aleksandar,
>
> > Don't worry that's a mistake, Sarunas put cont...@haproxy.com in copy to his
> > mail which lead to this.
>
> > Please don't continue this thread on the mailing list, thanks.
>
>
> Well, I assume I unders
Hello,
> Daniel, if using ssl to the backends shouldn't you use http mode?
> Per your config you are using tcp which is default one. Afaik tcp
> is for ssl passthrough.
For the record, this is not true. Just because you need TCP mode
for TLS passthrough, doesn't mean you have to use HTTP mode wh
Hi Mats,
Am 21.06.2017 um 14:30 schrieb Mats Eklund:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Thanks, here's the full config:
>
So for the record, what you are trying to achieve is to disable HTTP
keep-alive between haproxy and the browser?
In the default section, replace:
option http-server-close
with:
option httpclose
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> I attached a patch to improve the configuration parsing and to update the
> documentation. It can be backported in 1.7, 1.6 and 1.5. I finally marked
> this patch as a bug fix.
Applied, thanks to both of your for killing this on
Le 13/06/2017 à 14:16, Christopher Faulet a écrit :
Le 13/06/2017 à 10:31, siclesang a écrit :
haproxy balances by host,but often captures a part of request header
host or null, and requests balance to default server.
how to debug it ,
Hi,
I'll try to help you. Can you share your configu
Hi Mats,
Mats Eklund wrote:
> I am running a load balanced Tomcat application on Openshift Online
> v2, with HAProxy ver. 1.4.22 as load balancer.
With your current config, HAProxy will add a "Connection: close" header
to responses. However, since you mentioned you are running this in an
OpenShif
Hi,
Thanks, here's the full config:
global
maxconn 256
stats socket ...
defaults
modehttp
log global
option httplog
option dontlognull
option http-server-close
#option forwardfor exc
Sorry, replace httpclose with http-server-close
On 21 Jun 2017 7:55 pm, "Igor Cicimov"
wrote:
> Yes saw it but too late. Anyway according to the timers the Tr:26040 means
> it took 26 seconds for the server to send the response. Any errors in the
> backend logs?
>
> client_ip:193.XX.XX.XXX clie
Yes saw it but too late. Anyway according to the timers the Tr:26040 means
it took 26 seconds for the server to send the response. Any errors in the
backend logs?
client_ip:193.XX.XX.XXX client_port:18935 SSL_version:TLSv1.2
SSL_cypher:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 -- Tt:26150 Tq:106 Tw:0 Tc:3 Tr:2604
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:30:47PM +0300, Jarno Huuskonen wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> > This bug was fixed in 1.8 (see commit
> > 9f724edbd8d1cf595d4177c3612607f395b4380e "BUG/MEDIUM: http: Drop the
> > connection establishment when a redirect is perfor
Hi Igor,
the config is set to "mode http" (see below) only the log output is set
to "tcplog" to be able to get a more detailed log output. Please correct
me if I'm wrong but regarding to the config HTTP-mode is (or at least
should be) used.
defaults
log global
option tcplog
log-f
On 21 Jun 2017 6:34 pm, "Daniel Heitepriem"
wrote:
Nothing special. No errors, no dropped connections just an increased server
response time (Tr). An excerpt from low and high traffic times is below:
Jun 20 18:05:29 localhost haproxy[13426]: ndc vakanz-backend/10.2.8.28
client_ip:193.XX.XX.XXX c
Hi Christopher,
On Wed, Jun 21, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> This bug was fixed in 1.8 (see commit
> 9f724edbd8d1cf595d4177c3612607f395b4380e "BUG/MEDIUM: http: Drop the
> connection establishment when a redirect is performed"). I attached
> the patch. Could you quickly check if it fixes your bug (
Le 21/06/2017 à 07:27, Jarno Huuskonen a écrit :
Hi,
1.7.6 gives me errors (in log) with redirect rules. Example config that
produces 503 errors in logs and curl -v complains:
< HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
< Content-length: 0
< Location: https://127.0.0.1:8080/
<
* Excess found in a non pipel
Nothing special. No errors, no dropped connections just an increased
server response time (Tr). An excerpt from low and high traffic times is
below:
Jun 20 18:05:29 localhost haproxy[13426]: ndc vakanz-backend/10.2.8.28
client_ip:193.XX.XX.XXX client_port:50876 SSL_version:TLSv1.2
SSL_cypher:
On 21 Jun 2017 6:11 pm, "Daniel Heitepriem"
wrote:
Hi Jarno,
yes we are decrypting TLS on the frontend (official SSL-certificate) and
re-encrypt it before sending it to the backend (company policy so not that
easy to change it to an unencrypted connection). The CPU usage is not
higher than 15-20
Hi Jarno,
yes we are decrypting TLS on the frontend (official SSL-certificate) and
re-encrypt it before sending it to the backend (company policy so not
that easy to change it to an unencrypted connection). The CPU usage is
not higher than 15-20% even during peak times and the memory usage is
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, Daniel Heitepriem wrote:
> we got a problem recently which we can't explain to ourself. We got
> a java application (Tomcat WAR-File) which has to handle several
> million of requests per day and several thousand requests per second
> during peak times. Due to this high amount
Sounds like ssl connections are not being reused between haproxy and tomcat.
Can you send some netstat monitoring metrics showing tcp handshakes and time or
close waits over time?
--
Benjamin Lee
+61 4 16 BEN LEE
> El 21 jun 2017, a las 17:15, Daniel Heitepriem
> escribió:
>
> Hi everyone,
Hi everyone,
we got a problem recently which we can't explain to ourself. We got a
java application (Tomcat WAR-File) which has to handle several million
of requests per day and several thousand requests per second during peak
times. Due to this high amount we are splitting traffic using an AC
22 matches
Mail list logo
