s390 is big endian, amd64 is little endian
сб, 1 авг. 2020 г. в 02:25, Илья Шипицин :
>
>
> пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:29, Willy Tarreau :
>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:18:14PM +0500, ??? wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I see permanent error on Ubuntu 20.04 / s390
>> >
>> > https://travis-c
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:29, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:18:14PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I see permanent error on Ubuntu 20.04 / s390
> >
> > https://travis-ci.com/github/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/366958312#L623
> >
> > I will report to VTest, but if anyone has
Le 29/07/2020 à 01:29, James Brown a écrit :
In earlier versions of haproxy, the txn.f object had a `date()` method when
called from a fetch context which returned the current unix timestamp. In
HAproxy 2.2, this method is removed.
[...]
My best guess is that this is related to ae6f125c
Yo
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Christopher,
> Willy,
>
> Am 31.07.20 um 14:14 schrieb Christopher Faulet:
> > The 1.9 branch is EOL now. Thus, it is the last 1.9 release. No further
> > release
> > should be expected. It contains all pending patches marked to be
Hi,
HAProxy 2.3-dev2 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 44 new commits
after version 2.3-dev1.
As usual in the early cycle, many of them are fixes that also affect the
latest stable branch, but given that there were enough to crash the process
in various ways, those starting to play with 2.3-de
Christopher,
Willy,
Am 31.07.20 um 14:14 schrieb Christopher Faulet:
> The 1.9 branch is EOL now. Thus, it is the last 1.9 release. No further
> release
> should be expected. It contains all pending patches marked to be backported
> to
> the 1.9 to leave it in a proper state. Have a look at th
Hi,
HAProxy 2.0.17 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 19 new commits
after version 2.0.16. It's not much, nothing is likely to hit anybody who
was not already hit, but we thought it was worth flushing the pipe.
In short (some of them copied from the 2.1 announce):
- various DNS fixes (do-res
Hi,
HAProxy 2.1.8 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 82 new commits
after version 2.1.7.
It's been more than a month since previous version, so fixes have started
to accumulate, for sure.
I'll try to summarize since most of these were already mentioned over
the last 2.2 releases:
- various D
Hi,
HAProxy 1.9.16 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 86 new commits after
version
1.9.15.
The 1.9 branch is EOL now. Thus, it is the last 1.9 release. No further release
should be expected. It contains all pending patches marked to be backported to
the 1.9 to leave it in a proper state. Ha
Hi,
HAProxy 2.2.2 was released on 2020/07/31. It added 16 new commits after version
2.2.1.
It fixes some bugs in the DNS part. First, Jérome fixed a possible NULL pointer
dereference leading to a segfault when a server status is updated based on a
name resolution if the corresponding DNS answe
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:32:02PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Probably we should proceed differently and have something like these
> > for the cases where no return is desired:
> >
> > fcntl_noret() => unchecked fcntl()
> > setsockopt_noret() => unchecked setsockopt()
> >
> > Both
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:26, Willy Tarreau :
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > From e5a49969d374e3e8e9da695dca48cb6fa82ca13d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ilya Shipitsin
> > Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:10 +0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] CLEANUP: sup
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:18:14PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see permanent error on Ubuntu 20.04 / s390
>
> https://travis-ci.com/github/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/366958312#L623
>
> I will report to VTest, but if anyone has an idea, please let me know.
> it is a blocker for upgradi
Hi Ilya,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> From e5a49969d374e3e8e9da695dca48cb6fa82ca13d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ilya Shipitsin
> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:10 +0500
> Subject: [PATCH] CLEANUP: suppress coverity warnings
>
> Coverity is not happy when ret
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 14:14, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:01:49PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > From 2fd7431ed6e94fb48332e57ae569f194e38c1b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Ilya Shipitsin
> > Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:57:33 +0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: simplify usage of
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:34:45AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> another patch attached.
Sorry for missing this one, applied now!
thanks,
Willy
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:01:49PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> From 2fd7431ed6e94fb48332e57ae569f194e38c1b11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ilya Shipitsin
> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:57:33 +0500
> Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: simplify usage of env defined variables
>
> if SLZ_INC, SLZ_LIB, ZLIB_INC
ping
чт, 23 июл. 2020 г. в 00:34, Илья Шипицин :
> Hello,
>
> another patch attached.
>
> Ilya Shipitcin
>
ping.
вс, 26 июл. 2020 г. в 15:06, Илья Шипицин :
> Hello,
>
> cleanup patch attached.
>
>
> Ilya Shipitcin
>
sorry, one more patch
пт, 31 июл. 2020 г. в 07:48, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:13:14AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I repaired SLZ build.
> >
> > it used to work earlier because of SSL_LIB, SSL_INC variables.
>
> Makes sense indeed, applied now, thanks!
> Willy
>
Hello,
I see permanent error on Ubuntu 20.04 / s390
https://travis-ci.com/github/chipitsine/haproxy/jobs/366958312#L623
I will report to VTest, but if anyone has an idea, please let me know.
it is a blocker for upgrading to Ubuntu 20.04
Cheers,
Ilya Shipitcin
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 09:05:09AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 31.07.20 um 04:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> >> either I am dumb or it appears that the generation of HAProxy 1.9
> >> snapshots is broken. In
> >> http://www.haproxy.org/download/1.9/src/snapshot/ the newest tarball is
>
Willy,
Am 31.07.20 um 04:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> either I am dumb or it appears that the generation of HAProxy 1.9
>> snapshots is broken. In
>> http://www.haproxy.org/download/1.9/src/snapshot/ the newest tarball is
>> from Jun, 12th.
>
> Wow, seems you're right! However I really don't unde
23 matches
Mail list logo