Hello Willy, Ryan
I have ran the 3 times tests for each case
The following lists are the results.
TestA haproxy-1.8.30 + (patch 1+2+3)
1st 2nd 3rd
Shorter HTML: 0 0 0
HTTP 408: 2 1 4
TestB haproxy-1.8.30 + (patch2 only)
1st 2nd 3rd
Shorter
On 01.06.21 14:23, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Aleks,
On 6/1/21 10:30 AM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
This phrasing is understandable to me, but now I'm wondering if this is the
best solution. Maybe the already existing user-configurable unique request ID
should instead be sent to the SPOE and then
Aleks,
On 6/1/21 10:30 AM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
This phrasing is understandable to me, but now I'm wondering if this is the
best solution. Maybe the already existing user-configurable unique request ID
should instead be sent to the SPOE and then logged?
Tim,
Jun 1, 2021 9:50:17 AM Tim Düsterhus :
> Aleks,
>
> On 6/1/21 1:03 AM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
srv_conn([/]) : integer
Returns an integer value corresponding to the number of currently
established
connections on the designated server, possibly including the
Aleks,
On 6/1/21 1:03 AM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
srv_conn([/]) : integer
Returns an integer value corresponding to the number of currently
established
connections on the designated server, possibly including the
connection being
@@ -17514,6 +17509,9 @@ stopping : boolean
str() :
5 matches
Mail list logo