I've been trying to convert my haproxy setup (1.8.14) to by adding "alpn
h2,http/1.1" to my "bind" line in the frontend. My haproxy config is north
of 300 lines, so I'll hold off on attaching it.
My frontend selects backends using something like:
acl aerial_acl hdr(host) -m reg -i ^aerial[1
n
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:33 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 04:22:53PM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> > I've been trying to convert my haproxy setup (1.8.14) to by adding "alpn
> > h2,http/1.1" to my "bind" line in
We've been running haproxy 1.8 series for quite a while. We're currently
in the process of updating to 2.1, and have installed from the vbernat PPA
on Ubuntu 18.04 using the same old config file.
Now we are seeing segfaults a few times a day:
Mar 03 14:53:52 fw1.dev.realgo.com kernel: haproxy[86
have additional information. I wasn't able to find a -dbgsym
package, I even looked in the debian pool directory for the PPA. We're
talking like a haproxy-dbgsym package, right? Or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Sean
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:25 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦
(Sorry, meant version 2.0.13, not 2.0.3.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:19 PM Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> It's maybe a little bit early to say, but 2.0.3 has not segfaulted since I
> installed it, around 20 hours ago. The previous 20 hours had maybe a dozen
> segfaults, so this
ly weird about those, the most
complicated is probably:
acl aerial_acl hdr(host) -m reg -i ^aerial[1-4].(dev|stg).example.com
use_backend aerial if aerial_acl
Thoughts?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:56 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 4 mars 2020 13:19 -07, Sean Reifschneider :
>
> >
probably:
>
> acl aerial_acl hdr(host) -m reg -i ^aerial[1-4].(dev|stg).example.com
> use_backend aerial if aerial_acl
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:56 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
>> ❦ 4 mars 2020 13:19 -07, Sean Reifschneider :
>>
>&
com/p/nM6xq4Vp2z/
Thanks!
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 1:24 AM Christopher Faulet
wrote:
> Le 06/03/2020 à 18:53, Sean Reifschneider a écrit :
> > Here's what the stack traces look like, they all seem to be showing
> > "pattern_exec_match" and "epool_wait&q
nup = 0x0, canceltype
= 0}}}
not_first_call =
#9 0x7fbfa06b488f in clone () at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95
No locals.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:25 PM Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 3 mars 2020 15:34 -07, Sean Reifschneider :
>
> > We've been runni
the system after the upgrade (new system spin when we did the haproxy
update).
Thanks,
Sean
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:33 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 10:08:15AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 08:10:25AM -0600, Sean Reifschneider wrot
Been kind of watching for the haproxy versions to update in the PPAs for
Ubuntu. Considering the security nature of them, I'm kind of chomping at
the bit... :-) Any chance of those getting updated soonish? I can build
my own if there's a delay, but I should be able to build them here.
Thanks,
Ahh, thank you. I was expecting it to come through as the newer version
rather than a backport.
Sean
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:25 AM Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello Sean,
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 18:12, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> >
> > Been kind of watching for the hapro
12 matches
Mail list logo