Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:26:59AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your review.
> Sorry for being late, now I made a new patch.
>
> As you suggested, I added struct jit_regex. I also add typedef to
> avoid #ifdef's scatter here and there. I think the code becomes clean
Hi,
Thank you for your review.
Sorry for being late, now I made a new patch.
As you suggested, I added struct jit_regex. I also add typedef to
avoid #ifdef's scatter here and there. I think the code becomes cleaner.
Could you review it?
2013/2/13 Willy Tarreau :
> Hi,
>
> sorry it was long, but
Hi,
sorry it was long, but I didn't have time to review it earlier.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 03:00:42PM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I saw the mail "Re: PCRE >= 8.20 JIT support in haproxy >= 1.5.x?" at
> 2011-12-27,
> and give it a try.
>
> This is a patch for using PCRE JIT i
Hi there.
I saw the mail "Re: PCRE >= 8.20 JIT support in haproxy >= 1.5.x?" at
2011-12-27,
and give it a try.
This is a patch for using PCRE JIT in acl.
Could you review it?
I notice regex are used in other places, but they are more complicated to modify
to use PCRE APIs. So I focused to acl in
4 matches
Mail list logo