Am 10.11.16 um 10:24 schrieb Pavlos Parissis:
> On 09/11/2016 09:20 μμ, Steven Le Roux wrote:
>> Hi a first good coverage for a comparison between 1.5 and 1.6 would be
>> http://blog.haproxy.com/2015/10/14/whats-new-in-haproxy-1-6/
>>
>> 1.6 is perfectly considered stable and hasn't seen any mainte
On 09/11/2016 09:20 μμ, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> Hi a first good coverage for a comparison between 1.5 and 1.6 would be
> http://blog.haproxy.com/2015/10/14/whats-new-in-haproxy-1-6/
>
> 1.6 is perfectly considered stable and hasn't seen any maintenance
> release for more than 2 months. It's being
Hi Steven,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 09:20:10PM +0100, Steven Le Roux wrote:
> Hi a first good coverage for a comparison between 1.5 and 1.6 would be
> http://blog.haproxy.com/2015/10/14/whats-new-in-haproxy-1-6/
>
> 1.6 is perfectly considered stable and hasn't seen any maintenance
> release for m
Hi a first good coverage for a comparison between 1.5 and 1.6 would be
http://blog.haproxy.com/2015/10/14/whats-new-in-haproxy-1-6/
1.6 is perfectly considered stable and hasn't seen any maintenance
release for more than 2 months. It's being widely used so I would be
confident with it. It brings m
Bonjour,
Je suis désolé de vous spammer, je sais que vous avez autre chose à faire
:-)
Je compte utiliser HAProxy pour un nouveau projet (très grosse
application), des experts me disent que la version stable/éprouvée est la
1.5 mais je vois que la 1.6 est aussi stable et disponible,
Du coup, je
5 matches
Mail list logo