Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask?
We have a running SVN->Git mirroring via tailor, and some people
prefer to use Git for managing patches, because git
1) is faster 2) can manage many patches and branches 3) can work offline.
(I do not in
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask?
We have a running SVN->Git mirroring via tailor, and some people
prefer to use Git for managing patches, because git
1) is faster 2) can manage many patches and branches 3) can work offline.
(I do not intend this as hidden advert
Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask?
In any case, I tested it after I deleted the file and the file was
regenerated during the build. Did I miss something? I thought this bit
was already in the scripts.
-Nathan
On 11/13/06, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote
Patch applied - please test
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
I deleted the file and added it to the ignore property.
For those of us poor souls not using SVN directly
this deletion broke the build, as the file version_svn_tag.h
is not available directly now.
The issue HARMONY-2168 p
Nathan Beyer wrote:
> I deleted the file and added it to the ignore property.
For those of us poor souls not using SVN directly
this deletion broke the build, as the file version_svn_tag.h
is not available directly now.
The issue HARMONY-2168 provides a fix: copy the file.