Nathan Beyer wrote: > Not using SVN directly? Do I even want to ask? We have a running SVN->Git mirroring via tailor, and some people prefer to use Git for managing patches, because git 1) is faster 2) can manage many patches and branches 3) can work offline. (I do not intend this as hidden advertisment, sorry if it sounds like it).
> In any case, I tested it after I deleted the file and the file was > regenerated during the build. Did I miss something? I thought this bit > was already in the scripts. Nathan, thanks a lot for you attention! I do not think you missed anything, because it is really due to peculiarities in our setup. When SVN information is not available, pointless file copying wasn't performed, and this was also feature requested by me (to shorten recompilation time). Since the fix was committed promptly, I really don't see much problem in this particular case, and do not see anything that you need to change in your process. Thanks for the care, anyway.
