---
Haskell Weekly News
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/HWN
Issue 47 - October 31, 2006
---
Welcome to issue 47 of HWN, a weekly newsletter covering dev
Dear Haskell Folks
This is to announce the availability of indexed data types, a modest
extension of our earlier proposal for associated data types[1], in GHC's
development version. Detailed information on where to get the right GHC
and how to use indexed types is available from the Haskell wiki:
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/PackageMounting
> |
> | It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to
> | take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?
> |
> | Otherwise, this looks like what I've wanted all along, if only I knew
>
UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
Software Engineering Programme
Kellogg College
THREE UNIVERSITY LECTURERSHIPS IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Applications are invited for three new University Lecturerships in Software
Engineering. The successful applicants will join the staff of the
University's Software Engineer
| > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/PackageMounting
|
| It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to
| take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?
|
| Otherwise, this looks like what I've wanted all along, if only I knew
it ;-).
I think most of you know
> What about packages with multiple module trees like, say, Cabal?
That's a good question, and I think the right answer is not to do
anything special to support them. I assume that what you're referring
to with Cabal is that there is no common prefix for all of the module
names, but rather a small
Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to
>> take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?
> My intention was that -package-base specifies a base for the package
> specified in the preceding -package flag [...]
> In other w
On 10/30/06, Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 10:03:32PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
> On 10/25/06, Frederik Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/PackageMounting
>
> It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base fl
