On 28 November 2016 at 16:51, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Using a macro where the @inline* are put such that it is easy to replace
> with the @-command name if it makes its way in Texinfo would probably be
> what I would do.
I would add, it's not advisable to use @ul or @underline as the name
of the m
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:21:27PM +, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On 27 November 2016 at 20:27, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > On second thoughts, this is already possible. The best way at the
> > moment, I think, to underline text would be to output strings in the
> > output like this:
> >
> > this text isn
On 27 November 2016 at 20:27, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On second thoughts, this is already possible. The best way at the
> moment, I think, to underline text would be to output strings in the
> output like this:
>
> this text isn't underlined UNDERLINE_ONbut this text is.UNDERLINE_OFF
>
> Then after y
