Oh, my bad, I totally misunderstood the question. I don't think you could
use FUSE with Heroku, because of the way Dynos work. A Dyno isn't a full EC2
instance, if I understand it correctly, but rather a portion of one purposed
to run Rails, which is why you can't have a process run more than 30
se
On Feb 4, 11:30 am, Carl Anderson wrote:
> I've found this Firefox addon
> (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3247) works pretty well for
> general S3 use.
Not quite the same, as I want my web app to have access to s3.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscri
We updated the docs
http://docs.heroku.com/sendgrid
Thanks,
Pedro
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:30 AM, jajabak wrote:
> I actually did that after posting the question..
> However, this sentence on http://docs.heroku.com/sendgrid is
> misleading :
>
> ..This automatically creates a Sendgrid account fo
Ah, my bad, didn't notice DateTime could handle it.
But yes it seems like the lowest date supported by PG's date and
timestamp types is 4713 BC.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Matthew Mazur wrote:
> FWIW, it's worked fine with MySQL so Ruby can handle it. It's something
> about the way PostgreS
FWIW, it's worked fine with MySQL so Ruby can handle it. It's
something about the way PostgreSQL stores it that's causing the problem.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 4, 2010, at 2:54 AM, Pedro Belo wrote:
Even if you manage to store this date period on your database, Ruby
can't handle it afaik.
On Feb 3, 8:47 pm, Glenn Rempe wrote:
> Can you comment on which version of bundler you are using within
> heroku? I see that bundler v. 0.9.0 was just officially released and
> I noticed that there are some significant changes to the user
> experience, but I don't know if that changes how the Ge
I've found this Firefox addon (
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3247) works pretty well for
general S3 use.
Carl
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:58 AM, trans wrote:
> Is it possible to use FUSE mounts with Heroku? I was thinking about
> how to handle large assets via S3 for apps that us
Is it possible to use FUSE mounts with Heroku? I was thinking about
how to handle large assets via S3 for apps that use file stores, and
s3fs (http://code.google.com/p/s3fs/wiki/FuseOverAmazon) seems like it
would be a very convenient solution. Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are
I got it working. The problem was an old migration failing. Blah. Time
to consider consolidating old migrations.
Steve
On Feb 4, 7:35 am, Steve Odom wrote:
> Quick edit:
>
> > My migrations seem okay *on my development box* because I can migrate down
> > to 0 and back up
> > again with no probl
Quick edit:
> My migrations seem okay *on my development box* because I can migrate down to
> 0 and back up
> again with no problem.
On Feb 4, 7:34 am, Steve Odom wrote:
> heroku rake db:version doesn't return anything for me.
>
> I did not previously have schema.rb under version control. I a
heroku rake db:version doesn't return anything for me.
I did not previously have schema.rb under version control. I added it.
Reloaded it and a bunch of other things and still nothing.
My migrations seem okay because I can migrate down to 0 and back up
again with no problem.
I even said screw it
I actually did that after posting the question..
However, this sentence on http://docs.heroku.com/sendgrid is
misleading :
..This automatically creates a Sendgrid account for you, and
configures ActionMailer to use it by default...
Would be better to remove it from the docs.
Thanks.
v.
On Feb 4,
There are changes in Gemfile syntax like:
:require_as becomes :require
:only becomes :group
Today 0.9.1 was released.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Heroku" group.
To post to this group, send email to her...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from th
13 matches
Mail list logo
