[RE]Re: [RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.

2002-11-05 Thread seaofp
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ] http://csnation.counter-strike.net/comments.php?id=4890=true[1] In that article in CSN, the example describes the wall-hacker cannot see through the door. It's very odd thing.. :( -[ ¹ÞÀº ¸ÞÀÏ ³»¿ë ]-- > Title : Re: [RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-B

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: PB question

2002-11-05 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> Just to poke a dead horse I wonder who will have the last say > on this thread. I put down my body weight in gold - thats 438 > Kg - that is will be Eric the Remix0r. *poke* You must be a big boy... -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edi

Re: [RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.

2002-11-05 Thread Mike Hodgkinson
Thats right, no way around this with the HL engine currently to my knowledge. - Original Message - From: "seaofp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:31 PM Subject: [RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me. [ Converted text/html to

RE: [hlds_linux] new VAC bans for skins?

2002-11-05 Thread Matthew Watson
these guys are long standing admins, i'm 99% sure they are not cheats. > > They are probably cheaters. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002 _

Re: [hlds_linux] new VAC bans for skins?

2002-11-05 Thread Prodigy
They are probably cheaters. - Original Message - From: "Matthew Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:13 PM Subject: [hlds_linux] new VAC bans for skins? > Heya. > > I've had two of my admins banned by VAC from a DOD server I run. both c

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: PB question

2002-11-05 Thread James Clark
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:50:26PM -0500, Tyler Overkill Schwend wrote: > And the show has reached a new low! > > -Original Message- > Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to > distinguish > posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this > listserv. Why woul

[RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.

2002-11-05 Thread seaofp
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ] According to ur mail, with the new VAC-WH block, the wall-hack cheaters can still see through box and door and corner? -[ ¹ÞÀº ¸ÞÀÏ ³»¿ë ]-- > Title : Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me. > Date : Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:36:57 +1300 > Fro

[RE]Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.

2002-11-05 Thread seaofp
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ] According to ur mail, with the new VAC-WH block, the wall-hack cheaters can still see through box and door and corner? (image) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: h

[hlds_linux] new VAC bans for skins?

2002-11-05 Thread Matthew Watson
Heya. I've had two of my admins banned by VAC from a DOD server I run. both claim the only thing they have installed into halflife is various skins. So is VAC banning people using skins now? Could we seriously get a list of what VAC detects and also make it so it logs what someone was using? At

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: PB question

2002-11-05 Thread Tyler \"Overkill\" Schwend
And the show has reached a new low! -Original Message- Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to distinguish posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this listserv. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, o

Re: [hlds_linux] OT: PB question

2002-11-05 Thread Mad Scientist
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:27 pm, Eric (Deacon) wrote: > > Wait, what does OT mean and why did you post using it? > > Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to distinguish > posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this listserv. This least certainly has no end o

RE: [hlds_linux] OT: PB question

2002-11-05 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> Wait, what does OT mean and why did you post using it? Uh...OT stands for "Off Topic". It's a way for people to distinguish posts that aren't directly related to the main topic of this listserv. -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit yo

Re: [hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.

2002-11-05 Thread Mike Hodgkinson
Yes your odd ;-) Make sure your not looking through corners, and through boxes/doors. If you can still see players, stop and restart your server and see if that fixes it. - Original Message - From: "seaofp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:41

[hlds_linux] VAC WH-Block don't work for me.

2002-11-05 Thread seaofp
[ Converted text/html to text/plain ] I've tested the new VAC WH-Block with OGCglhack 2.5 in my server. Result: WH-Block don't work with my KYRO 2. I can see the enemy through the wall. It's the same result like the earlier VAC-beta phase. Am I odd? - Nar

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats

2002-11-05 Thread Jay Anstiss
Djeyl said: > hmm, why not http://djeyl.net/w ? ;-) I think you know why, Djeyl :D Jay. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats

2002-11-05 Thread Jay Anstiss
Mogely said: > I know you said you didn't code well, but if your smart enough to integrate someone elses work into your page, I would think editing a html file would be doable. With regards to not being a coder I was referring to things like php files. Yes, I could edit a html easy enough, but I

Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -November 4

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Bubrouski
Correct me if I'm wrong but it is server-side and all it does is stop the drawing of players who are behind walls, so wallhacks that see player models through walls no longer function. Things like seeing people through boxes and doors may still work because the models are still drawn in those case

RE: [hlds_linux] Help need For Linux Server

2002-11-05 Thread Eric (Deacon)
> > Yeah, but learning screen is a very good idea. There's really no > > reason to learn about ampersands and all that :) > > Well, actually, I use & to start my Linux seti processes in the > background, > since they are non-interactive. And, yes, I learned about the & > before screen. ;) Yes,

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats

2002-11-05 Thread dJeyL
hmm, why not http://djeyl.net/w ? ;-) cheers, -- djeyl - Original Message - From: "m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:35 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats > Jay Anstiss wrote: > > > Site: http://www.clan-jpf.com/ - in th

RE: [hlds_linux] NOW: HLD is NOT threaded -- WAS: Half-Life Server Graphing

2002-11-05 Thread Barry Kiesz
That was an excellent description of what's happening under the hood! I've been trying to get an explanation of this trying to decide whether to run 1 or 2 CPUs and would it make a difference in running HLDS because it wasn't written for SMP systems. I guess I have it now. On a side note, just l

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats

2002-11-05 Thread m0gely
Jay Anstiss wrote: Site: http://www.clan-jpf.com/ - in the menu bar on the left select the SERVER STATUS option(before anyone asks - yes, I have emailed the site's creator about it...) it has a very neat/smooth looking live server status feed in a pop-up window. I've seen some stats package

Re: [hlds_linux] Help me better understand cheats, hax, scripts etc

2002-11-05 Thread Matt
My thoughts are that people cheat because they want to feel cool. I don't really think it goes any deeper than that. They just want people to like them and think they are good. On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 18:28, Brian A. Stumm wrote: > > Hi, > > I've had serious problems lately with what seems like ch

RE: [hlds_linux] NOW: HLD is NOT threaded -- WAS: Half-Life Server Graphing

2002-11-05 Thread Tyler \"Overkill\" Schwend
What I'm hearing is... 1 HLDS + 2 CPUs = No performance gain, maybe a loss. 2 HLDS + 2 CPUs = W!!! Right? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/list

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats

2002-11-05 Thread m0gely
Stan Hoeppner wrote: Personally, I kinda like this one (for CS): http://bfb.bogleg.org/status.pl?s=bfb-cs2 ;) StanTheMan TheHardwareFreak http://www.hardwarefreak.com rcon admin at: Beer for Breakfast servers 209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD) 209.41.98.2:27017 (C

Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -November 4

2002-11-05 Thread Rene Luckow
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 02:38, Nick McLaren wrote: > Remember, the occluder is purposefully configured to be a bit conservative > in what it occludes in order to prevent issues where a player is occluded > in the non-wallhacked game when they are supposed to be visible. In other > words, to mak

Re: [hlds_linux] Wall Hack Block / Sound Hack

2002-11-05 Thread Rene Luckow
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 07:19, Mike Hodgkinson wrote: > No > - Original Message - > From: "James Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:55 PM > Subject: [hlds_linux] Wall Hack Block / Sound Hack > > > Does this stop the Sound Hack from

Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -November 4

2002-11-05 Thread [A.G.D]Beton
Afaik the VAC-Whblock is not using any server-CPU time cause it is running on the Client completely. The Server is only involved in distributing the VAC-module. HLGuard is completely server-side so it is taking a lot of CPU time. VAC Wallhackblock is more like Cheating Death. The disadvantage is,

RE: [hlds_linux] Half-Life Server Graphing

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
> Stan, the numbers along the bottom of the graph are times of > the day. It > becomes more clear when you click the graph and the entire > MRTG history page > shows up. It's a standard MRTG x axis quantity. > > Edge100x Ahh. Thx. Didn't realize the image was linked, heh. Stan ___

RE: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules -November 4

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Well apparently it affected your ability to cheat enough that it prompted you to send this email. Just wait till Valve improves it. Soon, you and your cheating buddies will be out of business. What will you do then? Attempt to mail flood every admin on this list, Karl? Or, wait, is Karl one of

Re: [hlds_linux] Half-Life Server Graphing

2002-11-05 Thread Edge100x
Stan, the numbers along the bottom of the graph are times of the day. It becomes more clear when you click the graph and the entire MRTG history page shows up. It's a standard MRTG x axis quantity. Edge100x - Original Message - From: "Stan Hoeppner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [hlds_linux] Help need For Linux Server

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
> Yeah, but learning screen is a very good idea. There's > really no reason > to learn about ampersands and all that :) Well, actually, I use & to start my Linux seti processes in the background, since they are non-interactive. And, yes, I learned about the & before screen. ;) Stan _

RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] online stats

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
Personally, I kinda like this one (for CS): http://bfb.bogleg.org/status.pl?s=bfb-cs2 ;) StanTheMan TheHardwareFreak http://www.hardwarefreak.com rcon admin at: Beer for Breakfast servers 209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD) 209.41.98.

RE: [hlds_linux] Help need For Linux Server

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
John, you should really look into screen. Using your method, you'll not have access to the hlds console. Starting hlds with screen is much more elegent, especially if you run more than one hlds server on a given host. StanTheMan TheHardwareFreak http://www.hardwarefreak.com rcon admin at: Beer

RE: [hlds_linux] Half-Life Server Graphing

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
> yeah works fine in combination with qstat. had a quick setup and > I'll enhance the site with cpu, ram and nic stats due to this > topic ;-) > > http://www.igazo.de/mrtg > > P.S. I prefer mrtg's graphs (rrdtools graphs are ugly :-))) Ok, the URL points to a graph. The vertical legend of the g

RE: [hlds_linux] NOW: HLD is NOT threaded -- WAS: Half-Life Server Graphing

2002-11-05 Thread Stan Hoeppner
> And yes, a single HLDS server IS running on two separate > CPU's. It is running on both CPUs, but NOT CONCURRENTLY. What the graph is showing (due to the data capturing method, I assume) is that the single HLDS process is being bounced from one CPU to another. As this bouncing can occur every