Afaik the VAC-Whblock is not using any server-CPU time cause it is
running on the Client completely. The Server is only involved in
distributing the VAC-module.

HLGuard is completely server-side so it is taking a lot of CPU time.
VAC Wallhackblock is more like Cheating Death.

The disadvantage is, that it can be worked around but it is only made to
stop OpenGL-Hacks and not client.dll hooks.

You should see no higher CPU load at all.

Best Regards,
Beton

http://www.nocheat.de



> > >   i think it's fair to say that any sort of WH blocking
> is going to
> > > eat=
>  a lot
> > >   of CPU resources.  the server now has to calculate clipping
> > > between e=
> very
> > >   player and every enemy so as to send only the visible stuff to
> > > each p=
> layer.
> > >   that's a lot of math.
> > >
> > >   it's how the HLGuard WH works (cpu usage on my server went from
> > > 40% w=
> ithout
> > >   WH blocking to 90% with using HLGuard, it's now hovering around
> > > 80% w=
> ith a
> > >   full server with the VAC WH blocker, so it's a little less
> > > intensive =
> than
> > >   the HLG one)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   "THC_Vaporizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> in message
> > >
> news:mailman.1036454882.12725.hlds_linux@;list.valvesoftware.com...
> > >   This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> > >   --
> > >   [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> > >   I haven't had the time nor the foresight to measure
> this, but has
> > > any=
> one
> > >   noticed an increase in CPU or memory usage due to the
> security module
> > >   upgrades and their increasing capabilities.  I can't be
> sure, but
> > > I t=
> hink
> > >   I'm seeing increased load from the server compared to
> yesterday.
> > > How=
> ever,
> > >   this may be unrelated to the module upgrade.
> > >
> > >   ~vap
> > >   --
> > >   Bongs 'R dUSt HLDS 24.43.236.74:27015
> > >   http://members.rogers.com/counterstrike
> > >














_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to