On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:40:07AM -0500, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
> James Clark wrote:
> >3110b here.
>
> Why wouldn't you use 3110c instead?
Probably =P (game "cstrike") (version "46/3.1.1.0/2147")
What ever that is? It's been ages since I did the last update - just
sitting tight till one point s
On Monday, June 16, 2003 4:59 PM [GMT+1200=NZT],
Britt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the majority of people running this 3111c? Or are you sticking
> with the 3110beta ?
> I've been watching and see different opinions and info posted
> regarding the differences and it seems that CPU usage is st
James Clark wrote:
3110b here.
Why wouldn't you use 3110c instead?
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:59:28PM -0500, Britt wrote:
> Is the majority of people running this 3111c? Or are you sticking with the
> 3110beta ?
> I've been watching and see different opinions and info posted regarding the
> differences and it seems that CPU usage is still a concern regarding thes
Scott Pettit wrote:
I'm running 3111c1. The way I see it is that we just have to move on
with the times and realise that games and the way they run changes.
We don't *have* to yet, thankfully. 3110c still works and is currently
the best choice :\ I can only hope that HL2's server will be designe
5 matches
Mail list logo