<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > > > And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
| > >
| > > Which is BS
| > > It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
| > > higher fps as a end resoult, most likely dependent on if you
| > > are
"hondaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| About the only perl I know is "man perl" :/
actually, it's perldoc perl :)
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.va
smpss> By removing player models from the field of vision that you cannot see you
smpss> decrease the amount of overdraw of playermodels happening on your screen (the
smpss> effect you get by a tilerendering card like Kryo-2, just to a lesser degree).
smpss> The vidcard not having to draw players y
> > > And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
> >
> > Which is BS
> > It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
> > higher fps as a end resoult, most likely dependent on if you
> > are CPU limited or Vidcard limited in your current FPS.
>
> Can you explain
where do you get the fps for a linux server ?
- Original Message -
From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] [OT] [No C-D] Stripping from stats
> > > And of course it
> > And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
>
> Which is BS
> It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
> higher fps as a end resoult, most likely dependent on if you
> are CPU limited or Vidcard limited in your current FPS.
Can you explain how exactly C-D
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
Yup. Sadly.
So you have to run insecure if you are running C-D?
What's so sad about that?
It lowers the CPU req on your servers.
And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
Which is BS
It can affect the FPS for a few people, but both with lower AND
> > Yup. Sadly.
> >
> >
> > > So you have to run insecure if you are running C-D?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> What's so sad about that?
> It lowers the CPU req on your servers.
And of course it drops your clients' frame rates in half :\
--
Eric (the Deacon remix)
Tyler "Overkill" Schwend wrote:
Yup. Sadly.
So you have to run insecure if you are running C-D?
What's so sad about that?
It lowers the CPU req on your servers.
The only sad part I can think of is that running your server in
"insecure" mode is the only way to block the cheats...
--
/Stefan
So
> > > > Crimony.
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > I believe it's an exclamation. I don't know what you'd say in NZ,
> > but I'm sure in London it'd be similar to saying something like
> > "blimey!" Or "geez", or whatever...
>
> Yeah. "Sheesh", "geez", "man...", that sort of expression, but
> I guess a region
In Psychostats the only thing we did was in the denyclan.cfg add this line.
clan: "[No C-D]"
Foad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| True.
| $name =~ s/\[No C-D\]\s*$//g;
| Only strips off the [No C-D] and any following white space at the end
| of line.
|
| But, just think of the problems if there is
True.
$name =~ s/\[No C-D\]\s*$//g;
Only strips off the [No C-D] and any following white space at the end of
line.
But, just think of the problems if there is a clan called [No C-D] :)
--agenthh
Blaine Kahle wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 07:50:11PM -0800, agenthh wrote:
Works fine. But, no whit
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 07:50:11PM -0800, agenthh wrote:
> Works fine. But, no white space in front and no extra junk in back is
> also good.
> $name =~ s/\s*\[No C-D\].*\n//g; does the trick.
> e.g. "This is a dumb name [No C-D] blah!" would be shortened to
> "This is a dumb name".
The [No C-
Works fine. But, no white space in front and no extra junk in back is
also good.
$name =~ s/\s*\[No C-D\].*\n//g; does the trick.
e.g. "This is a dumb name [No C-D] blah!" would be shortened to
"This is a dumb name".
You would place this in the hlstats or psychostats or whatevers script
where i
How is the new C-D able to work if it is not hooking the client .dll anymore?
--- Jeremy Brooking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:06, James Clark wrote:
> > Do what I do. Don't run C-D during the week and make it required during
> > the weekend. I'm starting to get the feel
it
> but make sure u have perl knowledge
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeremy Brooking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] [No C-D] Stripping from stat
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:06, James Clark wrote:
> Do what I do. Don't run C-D during the week and make it required during
> the weekend. I'm starting to get the feeling that C-D is going to need
> an update very shortly, starting to see unnatural BS even with C-D =(
>
> All my regulars have it an
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:58:16PM +1300, Jeremy Brooking wrote:
> I plan on running CD for a few days optional, until people get the hint
> to install it.
Do what I do. Don't run C-D during the week and make it required during
the weekend. I'm starting to get the feeling that C-D is going to ne
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 12:53, Kingsley Foreman wrote:
> wouldn't be hard to do just add something like
>
> $name =~ s/[No C-D]//;
>
> to a line after it gets the log but before it does anything with it
> but make sure u have perl knowledge
>
Yeah its more a time restraint problem I have.
I plan o
19 matches
Mail list logo